2000
DOI: 10.4324/9780203451151
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

An Economic History of Sweden

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
13
0
4

Year Published

2007
2007
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
5
5

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 76 publications
(17 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
13
0
4
Order By: Relevance
“…120 The main difference between the two series is the comparably stronger increase in the Gothenburg index after the 1920s and more pronounced fluctuations during the 1950s. 121 The indices appear to by and large be in line with the fundamental macroeconomic trends and developments in the Swedish housing market Magnusson, 2000). 122 Söderberg et al (2014), however, also reason that the index may not adequately depict the exact extent of the crises and their aftermaths in 1885-1893 and 1907. According to Söderberg et al (2014), it was rent regulation introduced during the years of World War II that held down the prices for apartment buildings.…”
mentioning
confidence: 93%
“…120 The main difference between the two series is the comparably stronger increase in the Gothenburg index after the 1920s and more pronounced fluctuations during the 1950s. 121 The indices appear to by and large be in line with the fundamental macroeconomic trends and developments in the Swedish housing market Magnusson, 2000). 122 Söderberg et al (2014), however, also reason that the index may not adequately depict the exact extent of the crises and their aftermaths in 1885-1893 and 1907. According to Söderberg et al (2014), it was rent regulation introduced during the years of World War II that held down the prices for apartment buildings.…”
mentioning
confidence: 93%
“…The increasing intensity of that critique combined with a genuine preoccupation for profoundly disrupting social trends to foster action and organization within parts of the European business classes. Paternalism flourished in that context (Magnusson 2000;Nielsen 1994). …”
Section: Historical Context: Industrialization and Personal Capitalismmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The focus shifted towards the supply-side, and firm profitability was to be achieved through currency devaluation and stagnating wages. Ultimately, this Resistance to the initial shock, employment change from the peak before the recession to the bottom of the shock Adaptability Post-recession growth (average annual employment change) Dec/Exp Emp Declining or expanding employment in the region or sector, 1990 compared to 2010 Micro 1-9 employees at a plant SME 10-249 employees at a plant Large 250 or more employees at a plant led to an overheated Swedish market and a major macroeconomic recession at the beginning of the 1990s, where gross domestic product (GDP) fell by 6% and unemployment rose from 1.5% (1989)(1990) to 8.2% in 1993 (Magnusson, 2002). The recession hit the economy hard and, as shown in Figure 1, it took a long time before Sweden managed to recoup an employment level with a magnitude similar to that of the late 1980s.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%