2017
DOI: 10.1111/ijcs.12362
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

An assessment of organic apparel, environmental beliefs and consumer preferences via fashion innovativeness

Abstract: The topic of organic apparel has been widely discussed among academics and practitioners in recent years. While numerous studies have been done on the topic, few studies to date have assessed the topic of fashion innovativeness and its influence on attitudes towards organic apparel. In addition, an evaluation of consumer preferences for organic apparel from a conjoint analysis perspective has not been implemented. Thus, the purpose of the present study was to identify which organic apparel attributes are most … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
28
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
2
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 26 publications
(28 citation statements)
references
References 36 publications
0
28
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Participants were asked to evaluate the level of agreement on each statement with 1 = "strongly disagree" to 7 = "strongly agree. " Specifically, Fashion consciousness was measured by five items adapted from Matthews and Rothenberg (2017) and Parker et al (2004). Environmental beliefs were evaluated by four items modified from Matthews and Rothenberg (2017).…”
Section: Instrument Developmentmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Participants were asked to evaluate the level of agreement on each statement with 1 = "strongly disagree" to 7 = "strongly agree. " Specifically, Fashion consciousness was measured by five items adapted from Matthews and Rothenberg (2017) and Parker et al (2004). Environmental beliefs were evaluated by four items modified from Matthews and Rothenberg (2017).…”
Section: Instrument Developmentmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Specifically, Fashion consciousness was measured by five items adapted from Matthews and Rothenberg (2017) and Parker et al (2004). Environmental beliefs were evaluated by four items modified from Matthews and Rothenberg (2017). Five items borrowed from Tian et al (2001) were used to measure the tendency for creative choice.…”
Section: Instrument Developmentmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Environmentally fashion can be described as a fashion involving with an overall process that can maximise the benefits to all wherein minimise the carbon footprint impacts (Joergens, 2006). Based on this systematic review, two studies were focussing on clothing (Khare & Varshneya, 2017;Matthews & Rothenberg, 2017); four studies of general product (Kim et al, 2016;Paparoidamis & Tran, 2019;Saleem et al, 2018;Shin et al, 2018); three studies of luxury items (Ali et al, 2019;Fiore et al, 2017;Han et al, 2019), while nine studies were focussing on cosmetics (Ahmad & Omar, 2018;Amos et al, 2019;Baden & Prasad, 2016;Chin et al, 2018;Ghazali et al, 2017;Hsu et al, 2017;Kahraman & Kazançoğlu, 2019;Ndichu & Upadhyaya, 2019;Pudaruth et al, 2015;). Past research by Khare and Varshneya (2017) show that relatives and friends are not important drivers in influencing the organic clothing purchase decisions of youths in India.…”
Section: Eco-fashionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It can be signifies that a decision to purchase this product is bonded based on personal pro environmental values and previous experience. Besides that, Matthews and Rothenberg (2017) found that customers in the United States were more concerned about sustainable materials, price and production, rather than the technology adopted. They prefer the eco-friendly labelling over organic labelling for apparels.…”
Section: Eco-fashionmentioning
confidence: 99%