2014
DOI: 10.5267/j.msl.2014.6.022
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

An application of TOPSIS method for ranking different strategic planning methodology

Abstract: Strategic planning is one of the most popular methods for setting up long-term objectives, which normally deals with various criteria. The Technique for Order of Preference by Similarity to Ideal Solution (TOPSIS) is a multi-criteria decision analysis method for ranking different alternatives based on various criteria. The method has been widely used among practitioners in different industries. This paper presents an empirical investigation to rank different business development strategies for information tech… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0
3

Year Published

2016
2016
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
(16 reference statements)
0
3
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…There are many Multi Criteria Decision Making (MCDM) methods available in literature for ranking such as Technique for Order of Preference by Similarity to Ideal Solution (TOPSIS) (Esfandiari and Rizvandi 2014), Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP) (Cheng et al 1999), and Grey Weighted Sum Model (GWSM) (Esangbedo and Che 2016). However, BWM is chosen for this study as it requires less comparison data and provides a more consistent result (Rezaei 2015), which not only reduces the number of pairwise comparisons and inconsistency in such a task (Labella et al 2021) but it also performs better than other multi-attribute decision-making models (Bai 2018.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There are many Multi Criteria Decision Making (MCDM) methods available in literature for ranking such as Technique for Order of Preference by Similarity to Ideal Solution (TOPSIS) (Esfandiari and Rizvandi 2014), Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP) (Cheng et al 1999), and Grey Weighted Sum Model (GWSM) (Esangbedo and Che 2016). However, BWM is chosen for this study as it requires less comparison data and provides a more consistent result (Rezaei 2015), which not only reduces the number of pairwise comparisons and inconsistency in such a task (Labella et al 2021) but it also performs better than other multi-attribute decision-making models (Bai 2018.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Pemilihan TOPSIS (Technique for Order Preference by Similarity to Ideal Solution) sebagai metode pertama dalam penelitian ini berdasarkan pada fleksibilitas nilai yang bisa diterapkan pada kriteria secara majemuk [8], [9]. Sehingga tiap kriteria dapat diberikan skala yang berbeda.…”
Section: Pendahuluanunclassified
“…TOPSIS yang pertama kali diperkenalkan oleh Hwang dan Yoon pada tahun 1981 [7], [9], memiliki dua nilai penting yakni positive ideal solution dan negative ideal solution yang pada akhirnya dapat menentukan rangking prioritas dari alternatif yang telah ditetapkan sebelumnya.…”
Section: Metode Penelitianunclassified
“…Önder, Taş, and Hepşen (2010) in their study assessed the economic performance model and ranked banks using AHP and TOPSIS methodologies. Esfandiari and Rizvandi (2014) presented an empirical investigation to rank various business development strategies for Information Technology improvement using TOPSIS. Akman and Pjgkjn (2013) proposed a model based on AHP and TOPSIS for evaluating the environmental performance of suppliers and developed a hybrid multicriteria decision-making model.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%