2009 International Conference on Field Programmable Logic and Applications 2009
DOI: 10.1109/fpl.2009.5272519
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

An analytical model relating FPGA architecture and place and route runtime

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2009
2009
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 9 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…These effects have been observed experimentally [17] and expressed analytically [6]. Of course, increasing logic block size will increase the runtime of the CAD stages that map logic to these blocks.…”
Section: Why Logic Block Size Affects Runtimementioning
confidence: 83%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…These effects have been observed experimentally [17] and expressed analytically [6]. Of course, increasing logic block size will increase the runtime of the CAD stages that map logic to these blocks.…”
Section: Why Logic Block Size Affects Runtimementioning
confidence: 83%
“…We considered three values for the second level hierarchy size (N 2=2, 4,6) and vary N 1 accordingly. Inputs at each level were chosen based on Equation 4 using a Rent parameter of p=0.8.…”
Section: Multi-level Logic Blocksmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Moreover, as these models do not require extensive CAD flow, they are very efficient in evaluating hypothetical architectures. Models with respect to several metrics such as wirelength [6], critical path delay [4], [5] place and route run time [3], routability [1], channel width [2], and area [4] have been recently proposed in the literature. These analytical models can be further classified depending on the architecture on which they are based on.…”
Section: B Analytical Modelsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…1b. Many quality metrics such as routability [1], channel width [2], place and route run time [3], critical path delay [4], [5] area [4] and wirelength [6] have been modelled with respect to the FPGA architectural parameters. FPGAs have been shown to consume on an average 12 times more power than ASICs [7].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Another drawback is that the signals have to be selected before compilation. Hence, observing a new subset of signals requires the circuit to be re-instrumented and recompiled, a process that can take hours [6]. Additionally, the insertion of the debug circuitry and the preselection of signals can alter the place and route of the design and can potentially create other problems, such as the user circuit may no longer fit in the FPGA device, or artificial timing limitations caused by the debugging circuitry.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%