2019
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijfatigue.2018.08.034
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

An analysis of defects influence on axial fatigue strength of maraging steel specimens produced by additive manufacturing

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

5
39
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 107 publications
(46 citation statements)
references
References 47 publications
5
39
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In Meneghetti et al, 33 the influence of defects on the fatigue response of a maraging steel was experimentally assessed. In particular, the specimens were produced in the XY and in the Z directions and tested without performing heat treatments, after a polishing process with progressively finer emery paper from grade 80 up to grade 800.…”
Section: Maraging Steelmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In Meneghetti et al, 33 the influence of defects on the fatigue response of a maraging steel was experimentally assessed. In particular, the specimens were produced in the XY and in the Z directions and tested without performing heat treatments, after a polishing process with progressively finer emery paper from grade 80 up to grade 800.…”
Section: Maraging Steelmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Porosities due to a localized lack of fusion during the process have, however, a strong impact on the ultimate strain and the fatigue life. The fatigue response of metals manufactured using L-PBF has not been extensively studied until very recently [5][6][7][8][9][10][11][12][13][14][15][16][17][18]. Even though toughness is generally high, fatigue performances appear to remain inferior to those obtained by conventional means.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It might be expected that a degree of transverse strain anisotropy was likely to remain due to the fabrication history, which was reported for AM alloys [27]. Moreover, the presence of detrimental surface and subsurface defects could cause some scatter in the strength and fatigue test results [28]. Obtained 0.2% offset yield strength R 0.2 and maximum withstandable stress R m of the AM samples of maraging steel may be considered repeatable in the satisfactory range.…”
Section: Fatigue Testsmentioning
confidence: 68%