2018
DOI: 10.1109/tap.2018.2872161
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

An Adaptive Least Angle Regression Method for Uncertainty Quantification in FDTD Computation

Abstract: The non-intrusive polynomial chaos (NIPC) expansion method is used to quantify the uncertainty of a stochastic system. It potentially reduces the number of numerical simulations in modelling process, thus improving efficiency, whilst ensuring accuracy. However, the number of polynomial bases grows substantially with the increase of random parameters, which may render the technique ineffective due to the excessive computational resources. To address such problems, methods based on the sparse strategy such as th… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
21
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
2

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 41 publications
(21 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
(32 reference statements)
0
21
0
Order By: Relevance
“…9 are satisfactory. The accuracies of using PCA-RR based method for UQ of the FDTD results are therefore 87.5% for average estimation and 72.2% for standard deviation estimation, which outperforms one of the state-of-the-art UQ techniques namely the least angle regression (LARS) method whose accuracies are 86.8% for average estimation and 63.4% for standard deviation estimation [41]. The main causes of unsatisfactory results from the PCA-RR based method include underfitting, outlier and unreasonable ε l .…”
Section: ) Accuracymentioning
confidence: 93%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…9 are satisfactory. The accuracies of using PCA-RR based method for UQ of the FDTD results are therefore 87.5% for average estimation and 72.2% for standard deviation estimation, which outperforms one of the state-of-the-art UQ techniques namely the least angle regression (LARS) method whose accuracies are 86.8% for average estimation and 63.4% for standard deviation estimation [41]. The main causes of unsatisfactory results from the PCA-RR based method include underfitting, outlier and unreasonable ε l .…”
Section: ) Accuracymentioning
confidence: 93%
“…The details of utilising the MCM for UQ are explained in [41], where µ(M) and σ(M) 2 are calculated by…”
Section: ) the Monte Carlo Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations