2010
DOI: 10.2105/ajph.2009.184705
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

An Actor-Network Theory Analysis of Policy Innovation for Smoke-Free Places: Understanding Change in Complex Systems

Abstract: Complex, transnational issues like the tobacco epidemic are major challenges that defy analysis and management by conventional methods, as are other public health issues, such as those associated with global food distribution and climate change. We examined the evolution of indoor smoke-free regulations, a tobacco control policy innovation, and identified the key attributes of those jurisdictions that successfully pursued this innovation and those that to date have not. In doing so, we employed the actor-netwo… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
61
1
1

Year Published

2011
2011
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
2
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 71 publications
(68 citation statements)
references
References 38 publications
0
61
1
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Fortunately, a small but growing body of literature emerging on the politics of tobacco control is slowly gaining attention (Cohen et al, 2000). In the past ten years or so, some useful attempts have been made to understand how and why specific tobacco policies have emerged in specific social, cultural, and political contexts (Albaek, Green-Pedersen, & Nielsen, 2007;Bryan-Jones & Chapman, 2008;Feldman & Bayer, 2004;Grüning, Strünk, & Gilmore, 2008;Kurzer & Cooper, 2016;Nathanson, 2005;Reid, 2005;Studlar, 2002Studlar, , 2007aStudlar, , 2007bYoung, Borland, & Coghill, 2010). To give one example, Nathanson (2005) examined differences in countries' political systems and cultures, and how these evolve over time.…”
Section: Understanding the Policy Processmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Fortunately, a small but growing body of literature emerging on the politics of tobacco control is slowly gaining attention (Cohen et al, 2000). In the past ten years or so, some useful attempts have been made to understand how and why specific tobacco policies have emerged in specific social, cultural, and political contexts (Albaek, Green-Pedersen, & Nielsen, 2007;Bryan-Jones & Chapman, 2008;Feldman & Bayer, 2004;Grüning, Strünk, & Gilmore, 2008;Kurzer & Cooper, 2016;Nathanson, 2005;Reid, 2005;Studlar, 2002Studlar, , 2007aStudlar, , 2007bYoung, Borland, & Coghill, 2010). To give one example, Nathanson (2005) examined differences in countries' political systems and cultures, and how these evolve over time.…”
Section: Understanding the Policy Processmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Do mesmo modo, as investigações brasileiras, que apesar de não serem numerosas vêm se mostrando constantes [37][38][39][40][41][42] . Além dessas, há investigações que tratam de moradores de pequenas localidades específicas [43][44][45][46][47][48][49][50] , enquanto outros trabalham as relações interpessoais de grupos profissionais como enfermeiras ou funcionários públicos [51][52][53][54][55][56] . As investigações feitas em serviços tiveram o intuito de avaliá-los [57][58][59][60][61][62] , assim como a utilização deles por parte de seus usuários 63 .…”
Section: Redes E Tabagismo: Breve Averiguação Bibliográficaunclassified
“…Core elements in these models are concepts explaining the construction of social groups, the spread of new behavior within such groups and the role of individual choices versus following the group norms. Examples for this group of models include diffusion theory (Ferrence, 2001) and actor-network theory (Young, Borland, & Coghill, 2011).…”
Section: Social Network Theoriesmentioning
confidence: 99%