2014
DOI: 10.15560/10.1.131
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Amphibians and reptiles from southeastern Goiás, Central Brazil

Abstract: Even harboring a high diversity and many endemic species of amphibians and reptiles, the Cerrado biome has shown drastic changes due to the conversion of natural areas into pastures and plantations. Here, we present a checklist of amphibians and reptiles from southeastern state of Goiás, Central Brazil. This checklist was the result of collecting efforts of an inventory along the basin of the Piracanjuba and Peixe rivers carried out between September 2010 and January 2011. We recorded 39 amphibians and 40 rept… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

2
11
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 27 publications
(32 reference statements)
2
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Santos et al (2014) registered 40 species of amphibians in 17 municipalities of the Piracanjuba and Peixe rivers basins in the southeast of Goiás. In the same way, long-term studies conducted to detect small spatio-temporal variations in the species composition between environments of a same region enable the registration of a greater species number and allows determining the actual species richness in the sampled environments , Gambale et al 2014.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Santos et al (2014) registered 40 species of amphibians in 17 municipalities of the Piracanjuba and Peixe rivers basins in the southeast of Goiás. In the same way, long-term studies conducted to detect small spatio-temporal variations in the species composition between environments of a same region enable the registration of a greater species number and allows determining the actual species richness in the sampled environments , Gambale et al 2014.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Considering that the size of the surveyed areas or the sampling effort may influence the amount of species surveyed, our records on species richness are similar to those from termite mounds in contiguous reservoir areas of the Serra da Mesa and Cana Brava hydroelectric power plant (47 species; Moreira et al 2009) as well as other areas in the Cerrado (Recoder et al 2011). Some of the surveyed sites in Cerrado have been reported to show lower reptile richness than recovering Brought to you by | University of Gothenburg Authenticated Download Date | 11/23/17 1:11 PM areas in Niquelândia (Uetanabaro et al 2007;Morais et al 2012;Ramalho et al 2014;Santos et al 2014;Silva et al 2015), while other studies have reported higher richness against our results (Silva Jr. et al 2005Valdujo et al 2009;Araujo & Almeida-Santos 2011). Nevertheless, as most species of reptiles, particularly snakes, tend to have low population densities and/or secretive habitats, the complete inventory of a given place demands a great amount of time and collection effort; consequently, it is highly possible that all above mentioned studies collected only a fraction of the total reptile richness of their study areas.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although we might conclude that these areas represent distribution gaps, the compilation of point records of Valdujo et al (2012) suggests that GIBF and SpeciesLink are incomplete. For example, in the case of some well-surveyed CER localities, the voucher specimens were deposited in collections not hosted by GIBF and SpeciesLink (e.g., Valdujo et al 2009, Santos et al 2014. Consequently, these localities seem to be under-represented by our density analysis; examples include the Estação Ecológica Serra Geral do Tocantins (states of Tocantins and Bahia, Brazil: Valdujo et al 2011) and southeastern Goiás State (central Brazil: Santos et al 2014).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For example, in the case of some well-surveyed CER localities, the voucher specimens were deposited in collections not hosted by GIBF and SpeciesLink (e.g., Valdujo et al 2009, Santos et al 2014. Consequently, these localities seem to be under-represented by our density analysis; examples include the Estação Ecológica Serra Geral do Tocantins (states of Tocantins and Bahia, Brazil: Valdujo et al 2011) and southeastern Goiás State (central Brazil: Santos et al 2014). If the aim of a study is to analyze general macroecological patterns of anurans in the CER, then GIBF and SpeciesLink should not be the only source of point occurrence records (e.g., Valdujo et al 2013).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%