2015
DOI: 10.1080/00032719.2015.1070166
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Amperometric Screen-Printed Galactose Biosensor for Cell Toxicity Applications

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
14
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

3
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 31 publications
0
14
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In a subsequent report, a microband galactose biosensor [21] was applied to the determination of galactose taken up by hepatocellular carcinoma cells (HepG2). In order to measure the toxicity of paracetamol to HepG2 cells, the cells were incubated with 10 mM galactose and different concentrations of paracetamol for 24 h. The enzyme was immobilised utilizing a similar method.…”
Section: Screen-printed Carbon Based Biosensors For the Determinatmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In a subsequent report, a microband galactose biosensor [21] was applied to the determination of galactose taken up by hepatocellular carcinoma cells (HepG2). In order to measure the toxicity of paracetamol to HepG2 cells, the cells were incubated with 10 mM galactose and different concentrations of paracetamol for 24 h. The enzyme was immobilised utilizing a similar method.…”
Section: Screen-printed Carbon Based Biosensors For the Determinatmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…So far, the most common method for the Gal analysis is the enzyme-based techniques using two types of enzymes: galactose oxidase (GalO x ) or galactose dehydrogenase (GADH), in association with spectrophotometric, polarimetric, and fluorometric detection of enzymatic products [8,9]. The GADH technique has been developed and commercialized; however, it is still expensive, time-consuming, and inconvenient (requires skilled personnel to operate them) [8][9][10]. Thus, electrochemical measurements, especially in conjunction with the use of amperometric biosensors based on GalO x , are becoming more attractive for Gal analysis [11].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Even though these methods are sensitive towards catechol, they are usually not only time-consuming, laborious, and require skilled-personnel to operate, but also involve complicated operational procedures that makes them unsuitable for point-of-need applications. Owing to the electroactive nature of catechol, the use of electrochemical techniques, especially at modified electrodes, are most attractive because they give rapid response and are simple, relatively inexpensive, selective, and sensitive [ 12 , 13 , 14 , 15 ]. Different nanomaterials including carbon nanomaterials, nanoparticles, metals and metal oxides, conducting polymers [ 16 , 17 , 18 , 19 ] including electrode pre-treatments and/or modifications have been developed for the quantification of catechol [ 19 , 20 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%