2020 ASABE Annual International Virtual Meeting, July 13-15, 2020 2020
DOI: 10.13031/aim.202000045
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

<i>Influence of tank-mix adjuvants on spray drift in wind tunnel</i>

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

1
2
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(3 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
1
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The reduction was from 18.9% for the "control" (water only) treatment, to 11.9 and 15.7% upon using 50% and 100% concentrations, respectively. These results are in agreement with the findings of [10,20]. The opposite trend was observed when adding HY adjuvant.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 92%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The reduction was from 18.9% for the "control" (water only) treatment, to 11.9 and 15.7% upon using 50% and 100% concentrations, respectively. These results are in agreement with the findings of [10,20]. The opposite trend was observed when adding HY adjuvant.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 92%
“…In turn, refs. [4,20] report similar results wherein the addition of adjuvant reduced the drift percentage, while [11] hold that the large values of surface tension for large droplets can be attributed to the cohesive forces within the solution molecules. Moreover, they see a difference in the surface tension of the water used in their study than that of normal water, and attribute this difference to the molecular size, entrained charge, and conductivity interactions of monosize droplets.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 80%
See 1 more Smart Citation