2014
DOI: 10.3399/bjgp14x677121
|View full text |Cite|
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Amoxicillin for acute lower respiratory tract infection in primary care: subgroup analysis of potential high-risk groups

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

2
33
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 34 publications
(35 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
2
33
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This is in contrast to retrospective European data where current smoking was an independent risk factor for antibiotic prescription in primary care patients presenting with cough and the increased risk of community acquired pneumonia and death of pneumococcal disease in smokers [14,15]. Yet the cough study demonstrated no improved recovery with antibiotics and subgroup analysis of a multi-centre randomised, placebo-controlled trial of amoxicillin versus placebo in LRTI showed no clinically meaningful advantage of antibiotic treatment, supporting our described UK findings [16]. …”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 76%
“…This is in contrast to retrospective European data where current smoking was an independent risk factor for antibiotic prescription in primary care patients presenting with cough and the increased risk of community acquired pneumonia and death of pneumococcal disease in smokers [14,15]. Yet the cough study demonstrated no improved recovery with antibiotics and subgroup analysis of a multi-centre randomised, placebo-controlled trial of amoxicillin versus placebo in LRTI showed no clinically meaningful advantage of antibiotic treatment, supporting our described UK findings [16]. …”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 76%
“…Figure 1 in the Moore article shows the strength of evidence for the lack of effect on duration of 'moderately bad' or worse symptoms. 12 But, we hear you say, my patient is special they need antibiotics because they are a smoker/have green phlegm/a more severe illness/chronic lung disease/ are going on a family holiday tomorrow/ have a vitally important business meeting in Washington DC next week [delete as appropriate]. Moore et al 12 address 'beingspecial' by investigating patient subgroups who might differ from the full group, for whom antibiotics may offer extra benefits (or harms).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…12 But, we hear you say, my patient is special they need antibiotics because they are a smoker/have green phlegm/a more severe illness/chronic lung disease/ are going on a family holiday tomorrow/ have a vitally important business meeting in Washington DC next week [delete as appropriate]. Moore et al 12 address 'beingspecial' by investigating patient subgroups who might differ from the full group, for whom antibiotics may offer extra benefits (or harms). Also referred to as 'looking for interactions', this article reports effects of antibiotics on patient subgroups defined by the presence/absence of factors that are of clinical concern: green phlegm; currently smoking; 'significant past medical history'; longer illness duration prior to consulting; fever at presentation; and 'minor' chest signs (not suggestive of pneumonia).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations