2016
DOI: 10.18203/2320-1770.ijrcog20160565
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

AmnioQuick Duo+ for diagnosis of premature fetal membranes rupture

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 15 publications
(28 reference statements)
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Only four recent studies (Ruanphoo and Phupong, Deckmyn et al , AbuFaza et al , and Abdelazim et al ) have been available to reveal the role of Amnioquick duo+ in diagnosing PROM and these recent studies did not compare the accuracy and response time of Amnioquick duo+ with that of PAMG‐1 tests. To the best of our knowledge, our current study is the largest study to date on Amnioquick duo+, and has remained the only study that has compared the diagnostic response time of Amnioquick duo+ and the PAMG‐1 test in women with symptoms, signs, or features suggestive of PROM.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Only four recent studies (Ruanphoo and Phupong, Deckmyn et al , AbuFaza et al , and Abdelazim et al ) have been available to reveal the role of Amnioquick duo+ in diagnosing PROM and these recent studies did not compare the accuracy and response time of Amnioquick duo+ with that of PAMG‐1 tests. To the best of our knowledge, our current study is the largest study to date on Amnioquick duo+, and has remained the only study that has compared the diagnostic response time of Amnioquick duo+ and the PAMG‐1 test in women with symptoms, signs, or features suggestive of PROM.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%