1984
DOI: 10.1016/0277-5395(84)90017-7
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

American anti-feminist women: Comparing the rhetoric of opponents of the equal rights amendment with that of opponents of women's suffrage

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0
1

Year Published

1993
1993
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
0
2
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Women have led anti‐suffrage campaigns (Marshall 1985; Thurner 1993), organised opposition to the U.S. Equal Rights Amendment (Frenier 1984; Marshall 1985) and taken part in contemporary forms of anti‐feminism (Steuter 1992; McRobbie 2011; DeKeseredy et al 2015). It is well documented that some young women offer widespread support for women’s equality with men while, concurrently, rejecting the label “feminist” (Buschman & Lenart 1996; Negra & Tasker 2007).…”
Section: Features Of Backlash and Resistancementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Women have led anti‐suffrage campaigns (Marshall 1985; Thurner 1993), organised opposition to the U.S. Equal Rights Amendment (Frenier 1984; Marshall 1985) and taken part in contemporary forms of anti‐feminism (Steuter 1992; McRobbie 2011; DeKeseredy et al 2015). It is well documented that some young women offer widespread support for women’s equality with men while, concurrently, rejecting the label “feminist” (Buschman & Lenart 1996; Negra & Tasker 2007).…”
Section: Features Of Backlash and Resistancementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Women's safety is routinely utilized to promote policy changes and frame public perceptions of policy problems. Yet, it is also routinely used to push against expanding non-discrimination policies, from protecting women in restrooms (Davis, 2017) to women in the voting booth (Frenier, 1984). The policy symbols utilized surrounding HB2 rhetoric focus on women as the victims, and those most likely to be harmed by the policy.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…No século XIX, porém, este tema levantou inúmeras controvérsias, contando com a oposição tanto de homens quanto de mulheres. Como destaca Frenier (1984), analisando o contexto estadunidense, aqueles que se organizaram contra essa bandeira apresentavam uma retórica contraditória: ora declaravam que o sufrágio feminino seria perigosamente revolucionário, no sentido de que abalaria as estruturas da sociedade e traria sua ruína ao embaralhar os papéis dos homens e das mulheres; ora afirmavam que o voto feminino não faria qualquer diferença, uma vez que as senhoras não se interessavam por -ou não tinham capacidade de compreenderpolítica e apenas copiariam a escolha dos maridos.…”
unclassified