2015
DOI: 10.1080/03772063.2015.1021387
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Ambipolar Leakage Suppression in Ge n-channel Schottky Barrier MOSFET

Abstract: This work presents a comprehensive study on ambipolar leakage suppression in Ge n-channel Schottky barrier MOSFETs (Ge n-SB MOSFETs). Also, Fermi level pinning due to metal-induced gap states between the metal contact and semiconductor is another constraint in this device, which restricts the modulation of Schottky barrier height. Here, we effectively suppress the ambipolar leakage by employing underlap gate structure over drain-channel junction, in addition with dopant segregation (DS) to depin the Fermi leve… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This indicates that the off-state leakage current (∼below 10 −8 A) of the devices in this work is controlled well, but the reason why the higher leakage current of device #3 than that of the other devices is attributed to an increasing hole injection in the OFF state. 24 Further, the on/off-current ratio of each sample can be estimated from the measured I DS -V GS (i.e., device #1 = 2.76 × 10 5 , device #2 = 2.22 × 10 5 , and device #3 = 2.52 × 10 3 ). From the measured I DS 1/2 vs. V GS plot, the threshold voltage (V T ) can be determined using the extrapolation method.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This indicates that the off-state leakage current (∼below 10 −8 A) of the devices in this work is controlled well, but the reason why the higher leakage current of device #3 than that of the other devices is attributed to an increasing hole injection in the OFF state. 24 Further, the on/off-current ratio of each sample can be estimated from the measured I DS -V GS (i.e., device #1 = 2.76 × 10 5 , device #2 = 2.22 × 10 5 , and device #3 = 2.52 × 10 3 ). From the measured I DS 1/2 vs. V GS plot, the threshold voltage (V T ) can be determined using the extrapolation method.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…17 Owing to the nature of ambipolar semiconductors, it is challenging to simultaneously achieve both low leakage currents (off-currents) and enhancement-mode (E-mode) operation, which has limited their widespread adoption in modern microelectronics. 18,19 The device channel with a moderately doped unipolar carrier can be completely depleted by electrostatic control in the gate region of an FET, which does not work for ambipolar semiconductors because both positive and negative bias applied at the gate region increase the concentrations of free (electron or hole) carriers in the channel region. 20 For instance, a unipolar n − -channel layer can be completely depleted by applying a corresponding negative bias at the gate contact of the MESFET.…”
Section: ■ Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…and low Schottky barrier height (SBH) metal silicides (ErSi 2−x , YbSi 2−x , DySi 2−x , and PtSi etc.) [6][7][8]. Recently, effective barrier height engineering using dopant segregation during silicidation has been widely adopted by the various research groups to improve the electrical characteristics of the device [9,10].…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%