2020
DOI: 10.1016/j.brs.2020.02.029
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Altered speech-related cortical network in frontotemporal dementia

Abstract: Background: In healthy subjects (HS), transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) demonstrated an increase in motor-evoked potential (MEP) amplitudes during specific linguistic tasks. This finding indicates functional connections between speech-related cortical areas and the dominant primary motor cortex (M1). Objective: To investigate M1 function with TMS and the speech-related cortical network with neuroimaging measures in frontotemporal dementia (FTD), including the non-fluent variant of primary progressive aph… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
4
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 45 publications
(36 reference statements)
1
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…We also found that phonemic fluency performance was associated with parts of left superior and ventrolateral frontal lobe. Similar ventral clusters were previously associated with phonemic fluency in nfvPPA 28 and in healthy adults. 29 The observed region has been associated with phonological/articulatory planning processes or lexical retrieval 30 and verbal working memory.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 83%
“…We also found that phonemic fluency performance was associated with parts of left superior and ventrolateral frontal lobe. Similar ventral clusters were previously associated with phonemic fluency in nfvPPA 28 and in healthy adults. 29 The observed region has been associated with phonological/articulatory planning processes or lexical retrieval 30 and verbal working memory.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 83%
“…Interestingly, evidence from behavioral brain imaging and brain stimulation studies suggests that primary motor cortex (M1) stimulation by tDCS may represent a promising and clinically feasible approach to enhance language therapy outcomes in post-stroke aphasia [ 9 ]. A few studies have also found that repetitive TMS stimulating area M1 can improve speech functions such as verbal fluency and naming to varying degrees, as well as enhance cognitive function to some extent [ 23 , 24 , 25 ]. However, there is little research on whether iTBS stimulation of M1 in the affected cortex induces changes in the brains after stroke.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The following left-hemisphere regions were obtained: pars opercularis, pars orbitalis, pars triangularis of the inferior frontal gyrus (IFG), superior temporal gyrus (STG), middle temporal gyrus, inferior temporal gyrus, anterior temporal gyrus (ATG), posterior temporal gyrus, and dorsolateral prefrontal cortex (DLPFC). We selected these regions because they have been reported to be prominent areas of atrophy in individuals with nfvPPA and because they have also been implicated in language in studies of individuals with PPA and HC (Brambati et al, 2009; Davies et al, 2005; Ikeda et al, 1996; Lippa et al, 1991; Mesulam et al, 2009; Rogalski et al, 2011; Shim et al, 2012; Suppa et al, 2020; Wilson et al, 2010).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%