Aligning Concerns in Telecare: Three Concepts to Guide the Design of Patient-Centred E-Health

Abstract

The design of patient-centred e-health services embodies an inherent tension between the concerns of clinicians and those of patients. Clinicians' concerns are related to professional issues to do with diagnosing and curing disease in accordance with accepted medical standards. In contrast, patients' concerns typically relate to personal experience and quality of life issues. It is about their identity, their hopes, their fears and their need to maintain a meaningful life. This divergence of concerns presents a fundamental challenge for designers of patient-centred e-health services. We explore this challenge in the context of chronic illness and telecare. Based on insights from medical phenomenology as well as our own experience with designing an e-health service for patients with chronic heart disease, we emphasise the importanceand difficultyof aligning the concerns of patients and clinicians. To deal with this, we propose a set of concepts for analysing concerns related to the design of e-health services: A concern is (1) meaningful if it is relevant and makes sense to both patients and clinicians, (2) actionable if clinicians or patientsat least in principleare able to take appropriate action to deal with it, and (3) feasible if it is easy and convenient to do so within the organisational and social context. We conclude with a call for a more participatory and iterative approach to the design of patient-centred ehealth services.

mHealth applications to support caregiver needs and engagement during stroke recovery: A content review

“…Finally, there is a need to ensure the user is aware of the functionality and quality of content, which should be delivered plainly using the app description page. The future direction of mHealth app development to support caregiving engagement would therefore entail the inclusion of iterative user‐centred design (Tighe et al, 2020), most notably the participatory design principles, to ensure the design of the app includes an iterative process for development with the user at the centre of the design; guiding the process of design and usability based on their needs and requirements (Andersen et al, 2019).…”

How People with Parkinson's Disease and Health Care Professionals Wish to Partner in Care Using eHealth: Co-Design Study

“…However, previous research has shown that discrepancy in patients’ and HCP’s perceptions of which information is important for health care staff to know and respond to may lead to disappointments [ 38 ]. A central aspect in the design of such functionalities is the “alignment of concerns” between patients and HCPs to ensure that the shared information is considered meaningful, actionable, and feasible from the perspectives of both patients and HCPs [ 39 ].…”

“…Thus, our study does not allow us to draw conclusions about the actual value of the desired eHealth functionalities for co-care, including cost-effectiveness and clinical outcomes. Nevertheless, we believe that the multistakeholder co-design workshops provided an effective forum for the PwP and HCPs to discuss and align their concerns, which has been described as a prerequisite for successful design and implementation [ 39 ]. This may have been confirmed by the high ratings of the importance of all co-designed functionalities in our evaluation questionnaire.…”

Understanding the Methodological Issues and Solutions in the Research Design of Stroke Caregiving Technology

“…These challenges need to be addressed to ensure new technological solutions are acceptable to their target end users. However, to date, researchers do not fully understand the scope and complexity of including users in the design of the care support system (10). This leads to issues in adoption of the solutions proposed.…”