Fluvial Remote Sensing for Science and Management 2012
DOI: 10.1002/9781119940791.ch7
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Airborne LiDAR Methods Applied to Riverine Environments

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
18
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
5
1
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(20 citation statements)
references
References 57 publications
0
18
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Bathymetric LiDAR 0.10-0.30 1.00 <1.00 3.90 Kinzel et al, 2007;Feurer et al, 2008;Bailly et al, 2010Bailly et al, , 2012 TLS 0.004-0.03 <0.05 N/a N/a Heritage and Hetherington, 2007;Bangen et al, 2014;Smith and Vericat, 2013 below the water surface, h is the true water depth, h A is the apparent water depth, n 2 is the refractive index of air (which has a value of 1) and n 1 is the refractive index of water. For clear water, n 1 has a value of 1.34, which varies by less than 1% for a range of temperature and salinity conditions (Jerlov, 1976;Westaway et al, 2001;Butler et al, 2002).…”
Section: Existing Approachesmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Bathymetric LiDAR 0.10-0.30 1.00 <1.00 3.90 Kinzel et al, 2007;Feurer et al, 2008;Bailly et al, 2010Bailly et al, , 2012 TLS 0.004-0.03 <0.05 N/a N/a Heritage and Hetherington, 2007;Bangen et al, 2014;Smith and Vericat, 2013 below the water surface, h is the true water depth, h A is the apparent water depth, n 2 is the refractive index of air (which has a value of 1) and n 1 is the refractive index of water. For clear water, n 1 has a value of 1.34, which varies by less than 1% for a range of temperature and salinity conditions (Jerlov, 1976;Westaway et al, 2001;Butler et al, 2002).…”
Section: Existing Approachesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, the use of near-infrared light, which is strongly absorbed in water, usually makes quantification of submerged topography impossible (Lane and Carbonneau, 2007;Legleiter, 2012). At present however, the application of airborne bathymetric laser scanning to the mesoscale study of fluvial environments is severely limited by high cost, restricted sensor availability, coarse spatial resolution and a lack of reliability in shallower waters (McKean et al, 2009;Bailly et al, 2012;Hicks, 2012;Legleiter, 2012;Marcus, 2012;Kinzel et al, 2013). Blue-green scanning approaches are less affected by turbidity and water surface roughness than passive remote sensing techniques (Marcus, 2012), and are capable of surveying much greater water depths (Bailly et al, 2010;Kinzel et al, 2013).…”
Section: Laser Scanningmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The new generation of waterproof rotary wing UAVs equipped with visual navigation sensors and automatic ≈ 2 m; 1-1.5 m 0.10-0.20 m ≈ 1-1.5 times the Secchi depth Fonstad and Marcus (2005), Legleiter and Overstreet (2012). Bailly et al (2012Bailly et al ( , 2010, Charlton et al (2003), Hilldale and Raff (2008), Kinzel et al (2007). pilot systems will make it possible to collect hyperspatial observations in remote or dangerous locations, without requiring the operator to access the area.…”
Section: Future Researchmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The utilisation of laser scanning methods in fluvial studies, particularly airborne LiDAR (Light Detection and Ranging), is becoming commonplace and high resolution digital elevation models are providing a standard platform for basin-scale river research and applications (for reviews see [141][142][143]). With field surveys rarely covering the entire drainage basin, automated extraction of cross-sections (extending over the floodplain) from LiDAR-derived topography has considerable merit (e.g., [144]) and GIS-based routines are now highly efficient at providing cross-section datasets for user-defined locations (or spacing) with minimal expertise required [145,146]; examples include the GeoRAS component of the HEC-RAS hydraulic modelling package [147] and MAT (Modelling Assistant Tool, developed by JBA Consulting, Skipton, UK).…”
Section: Cross-sections and Slopementioning
confidence: 99%