AHP and CBA Application to Layout Design: A Case of Classroom Layout Assessment

Abstract

Arriving at a consensus in design decisions is challenging owing to the presence of diverse and multidisciplinary stakeholders with multiple design objectives. The literature on AEC design decision making have reported Analytic Hierarchy Process and Choosing by Advantages as two commonly used multi-criteria decision-making techniques for evaluation of design alternatives. However, the existing literature has mainly focused on choosing between material or technology and the comparison of the two techniques to assess the suitability for their application to non-spatial aspects of AEC design problem. The current work seeks to investigate the suitability of CBA and AHP to a layout design problem. A decision-making exercise involving a hypothetical case of evaluation of three classroom layouts was conducted. A set of criteria for design evaluation which was derived based on a previous study on stakeholder design values was used in the exercise. Conclusions were drawn based on the operationalization of the two techniques rather than a direct comparison of the results obtained from the two techniques. The findings from the study indicate that CBA aids in defining a robust set of design criteria, sub-criteria and attributes and facilitates a collaborative decision-making process. On the other hand, AHP provides a structured approach for eliciting individual participant judgments. The benefits and limitations with respect to the operationalization of the two techniques are discussed in detail. KEYWORDSChoosing by advantage (CBA), set based design (SBD), analytic hierarchy process (AHP) and target value design (TVD)

Choosing by Advantages Application Areas in Facilities Management: A Literature Review

“…Over two decades, CBA has received increasing attention in lean construction, mainly in participatory design, sustainable materials and method selection. There is also an increasing focus on comparing CBA with similar decision-making methods such as Analytical Hierarchy Process (AHP), Weighting Rating Calculating (WRC), and Best Value Selection (BVS) [17,18,45]. The results of the CBA literature review are presented in this section based on the identified categories in the methodology.…”

Reducing Bias in the Hiring Process Through Choosing by Advantages: A Case Study

“…This increase has been driven by demands for more collaborative project organizations and transparent decision-making processes due to the synergy of CBA with other agendas such as improving sustainability and safety and by a growing need to incorporate multiple factors into the decision-making process. Although CBA has been applied in several types of decisions; it has focused on design (Arroyo & Long, 2018;Perez & Arroyo, 2019;Sahadevan & Varghese, 2019;Schöttle et al, 2019Schöttle et al, , 2018, with only one study in the literature on its application in personnel selection for a new member of a construction team (Paucar-Espinoza et al, 2021).…”

Strengthening Target Value Design Benefits in Real Estate Market Through Living Labs

“…Some examples in other contexts are reported in the literature. Russel-Smith et al (2014) discussed the possibility of a Sustainable Target Value Design, aiming to reduce the life cycle impacts, setting targets for environmental indicators tools to evaluate the results and use TVD in green buildings design Additional research on TVD included classroom's layout improvements, using TVD to facilitate the decision-making process (Sahadevan and Varghese, 2019), and simulation games to engage stakeholders in Nigeria's real estate context (Musa et al 2019).…”