Aggressive Tax Avoidance by Managers of Multinational Companies as a Violation of Their Moral Duty to Obey the Law: A Kantian Rationale

Abstract

Managers of multinational companies often favour an aggressive tax avoidance strategy that pushes the legal limits onto the advantage of shareholders and the disadvantage of the spirit of democratically legitimized tax laws. The public and media debate whether such aggressive behaviour is immoral. Aggressive tax avoidance is a subset of the aggressive legal interpretations potentially observable in all fields which places little weight on the will of a democratically legitimized legislation. A thorough ethical analysis based on the deontological approach of Kant demonstrates that aggressive tax avoidance as a special case of operating on the edge of legal boundaries is potentially immoral. Applying the Kantian "contradiction of conception or will" test shows that this maxim might not be conceived or willed as a general law of nature. If all natural or legal persons aggressively interpret laws on all subjects and in every imaginable situation, then central principles of the system of law we all rely upon would be severely compromised. Therefore, aggressive tax avoidance by managers of multinational companies may violate the managers' moral duty to obey not only the letter but also the intention or spirit of the law. The validity of the argumentation depends critically on the formulation and interpretation of the respective maxims and on assumptions about the legal system. Preserving central elements of Kantian philosophy, the article demonstrates the complexity of a philosophical argumentation which tries to justify the moral intuitions that underpin the common negative evaluation of aggressive legal strategies in business.

Peran Financial Distress dalam Pengaruh Konservatisme Akuntansi terhadap Tax Avoidance

“…Upaya pengurangan beban pajak tersebut dapat dilakukan melalui pemanfaatan kelemahan yang ada dalam ketentuan perpajakan maupun perbedaan ketentuan perpajakan antar yurisdiksi (Richardson et al, 2015b). Lebih lanjut, Lenz (2018) mengadaptasi penjelasan Lietz (2013) menyebutkan bahwa terdapat 3 (tiga) elemen kunci dalam tax avoidance yaitu responsible, aggressive, dan abusive. Responsible tax avoidance mengacu pada tax avoidance yang bersifat perfectly legal.…”

A Contradiction of Corporate Social Responsibility in Moderating Tax Avoidance

“…Tax avoidance is a legal reduction effort carried out by optimally utilizing taxation provisions such as allowed exemptions and deductions as well as the benefits of things that have not been regulated (Onainor, 2019;Alstadsaetar et al, 2022). Tax avoidance is a method of reducing taxes that are still within the scope of tax laws and regulations and can be justified, particularly through tax planning against flaws in tax regulations (Lenz, 2020).…”

Morality of Lobbying for Tax Benefits: A Kantian Perspective

“…These leaders have their own maxims, intentions and reasons to act. They have a duty to conceive, incorporate and organise the corporations in such a way that the corporation's mission statement, policies and decision-making structures respond to the categorical imperative (Altman, 2007;Lenz, 2018). Looked at from this perspective, the multinational also indirectly bears moral duties.…”