2006
DOI: 10.1080/09064700601079527
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Aggressive and sexual behaviour of growing and finishing pigs reared in groups, without castration

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

10
87
3
6

Year Published

2011
2011
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 68 publications
(106 citation statements)
references
References 31 publications
10
87
3
6
Order By: Relevance
“…We did not observe a significant effect of the environment on the number of performed mounting behaviours probably because of the very high variability of this parameter. Such variability between pigs was already shown by Rydhmer et al (2006) who observed that almost half of the pigs did not perform mounting behaviours, whereas the average number calculated in the others was higher than two.…”
Section: Indicators Of the Pubertal Developmentsupporting
confidence: 55%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…We did not observe a significant effect of the environment on the number of performed mounting behaviours probably because of the very high variability of this parameter. Such variability between pigs was already shown by Rydhmer et al (2006) who observed that almost half of the pigs did not perform mounting behaviours, whereas the average number calculated in the others was higher than two.…”
Section: Indicators Of the Pubertal Developmentsupporting
confidence: 55%
“…This may be detrimental to the welfare as pointed out by Rydhmer et al (2006) who found more bites at the skin inspection in pigs being mounted and who suggested a higher risk of leg problems. The reason for the higher number of mounting behaviour in the enriched environment is not known but may be related to an overall higher level of activity that was observed by Tallet et al (2013).…”
Section: Indicators Of the Pubertal Developmentmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The discrepancy between the skin lesions and behavioural observations could be due to the rather basic observation method which was limited to a relatively short period of scan-sampling recording once every 2 weeks. On the other hand, our basic observation appeared adequate to detect differences in sexual and aggressive behaviour between boars and gilts, which are in line with common knowledge (Rydhmer et al, 2006). Effect of MC4R on boar taint, puberty and behaviour in pigs Therefore, we tentatively conclude that possible differences in sexual and aggressive behaviour between AA and GG boars -if any -will be less compared with the differences between gilts and boars.…”
supporting
confidence: 84%
“…In commercial growing-finishing pigs, however, sexually mature gilts could become pregnant when reared in mixed pens. Slaughtering pregnant gilts should be avoided for ethical reasons; therefore single-sex rearing of GG pigs is recommended (Rydhmer et al, 2006). Behaviour, skin lesions and lameness A higher percentage of AA animals showed passive and feeding behaviour compared with GG animals.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation