2020
DOI: 10.1016/j.molliq.2019.112210
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Aggregation and interactional behavior of cationic surfactants in the presence of cephalosporin drug: A thermo-acoustic and spectroscopic approach

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

3
7
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 18 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 58 publications
3
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The results showed that the cmc value of the IMP + TX-100 system reduced when the α 1 of TX-100 enhanced in the solution. As specified in the literature, amphiphilic drug and surfactant mixtures formed mixed micelles via interaction through each other [33,38]. Here, the resulting cmc value of the mixtures showed that mixed micelle formation occurred at inferior concentrations due to the diminution in electrostatic repulsion among the constituent molecules in each used media variation.…”
Section: Cmc and Ideal Cmc (Cmc Id ) Values In Various Mediasupporting
confidence: 56%
“…The results showed that the cmc value of the IMP + TX-100 system reduced when the α 1 of TX-100 enhanced in the solution. As specified in the literature, amphiphilic drug and surfactant mixtures formed mixed micelles via interaction through each other [33,38]. Here, the resulting cmc value of the mixtures showed that mixed micelle formation occurred at inferior concentrations due to the diminution in electrostatic repulsion among the constituent molecules in each used media variation.…”
Section: Cmc and Ideal Cmc (Cmc Id ) Values In Various Mediasupporting
confidence: 56%
“…The CMC values of surfactant also show decrease with increase in the length of alkyl chain (Et 4 N + Br − > Pr 4 N + Br − > Bu 4 N + Br − ). Also, the hydrophobic backbone of CTAB is responsible for the effect of R 4 N + Br − in lowering the CMC of CTAB, implying that the hydrophobic interaction is more prevalent in the aggregation behavior (Chauhan et al, 2014; Chauhan & Kaur, 2017; Pathania & Chauhan, 2020a).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Their self‐assembling property makes them to be utilized in different fields like membrane mimetic medium, drug delivery, flow field regulators, pharmaceutical formulations, and separations (Schramm et al, 2003). These amphiphiles show peculiar concentration dependence: at low concentrations, they exist as monomers, but on increasing surfactant concentration, the monomers aggregate into a variety of thermodynamically stable structures known as micelles (direct or reverse, spherical, or nonspherical), microtubules, vesicles (e.g., liposomes), and other bilayered structures (Chauhan & Pathania, 2018; Pathania & Chauhan, 2020a). Surfactant micellization can be influenced by temperature, pH, or the addition of various organic/inorganic solutes which can bring alterations in surfactant–surfactant and surfactant–solvent interactions in solution.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Therefore, there is great signicance of the micelle aggregate of amphiphile to dissolve the water-insoluble medicines to reduce toxicity, and increase bio-availability. 11 Due to the large surface area, surfactant micelle can be added toward chemical reactions to increase the rate of reaction rate termed as catalyst. 12,13 The micelle structure is concerned with the bio-membrane arrangement.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%