The platform will undergo maintenance on Sep 14 at about 7:45 AM EST and will be unavailable for approximately 2 hours.
2012
DOI: 10.1093/ser/mws012
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Agents of privatization? Business groups and the rise of pension funds in Continental Europe

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
35
0
1

Year Published

2015
2015
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
5
4

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 64 publications
(38 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
2
35
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…As Naczyk (: 442) put it bluntly in his analysis on the rise of pension funds in Belgium and France, ‘Since they sell products that may directly compete with public social insurance, financial firms – especially insurance companies – can be expected to be a key proponent of retrenchment in public/statutory pensions and their concomitant partial privatization’. It is to be highlighted that the market‐oriented explanation also points to the role of strong states as the creation of pension and financial markets needs governments which are able to implement liberalizing reforms (sometimes against the vested interests of groups benefitting from state‐run or employer‐led schemes; on which, see Naczyk ; Hyde and Borzutzky ). In addition, powerful financial companies and the influence of international organizations such as the IMF can be viewed as the two requisite scope conditions making the lobbying efforts of finance effective.…”
Section: The Finance‐pension Nexus: Market‐oriented Versus State‐centmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As Naczyk (: 442) put it bluntly in his analysis on the rise of pension funds in Belgium and France, ‘Since they sell products that may directly compete with public social insurance, financial firms – especially insurance companies – can be expected to be a key proponent of retrenchment in public/statutory pensions and their concomitant partial privatization’. It is to be highlighted that the market‐oriented explanation also points to the role of strong states as the creation of pension and financial markets needs governments which are able to implement liberalizing reforms (sometimes against the vested interests of groups benefitting from state‐run or employer‐led schemes; on which, see Naczyk ; Hyde and Borzutzky ). In addition, powerful financial companies and the influence of international organizations such as the IMF can be viewed as the two requisite scope conditions making the lobbying efforts of finance effective.…”
Section: The Finance‐pension Nexus: Market‐oriented Versus State‐centmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The other group of domestic actors most strongly supporting private accounts was the financial industry. Insurance companies, banks, or stock exchanges were indeed clear winners of pension privatization since they were to be the main providers of private pension products (Kemmerling and Neugart ; Leimgruber ; Naczyk ).…”
Section: Pension Privatization's Contribution To Economic Growth Tramentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Desde la crisis del estado de bienestar en la Europa continental, expresada en la privatización de servicios de seguridad social como las pensiones (Naczyk 2012), hasta las luchas sociales contra la privatización de los recursos hídricos en Bolivia (Sanz 2006;Spronk 2007), pasando por la participación de agentes estatales corruptos en procesos de privatización en el norte de África (Hibou 2013), se evidencia el ascenso de agentes privados.…”
Section: Lo Público Y Lo Estatalunclassified