2010
DOI: 10.3329/bsmmuj.v3i1.5508
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Age-Related Differences of Risk Profile and Angiographic Findings in Patients with Coronary Heart Disease

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

6
17
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(23 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
6
17
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Although our study demonstrated a stronger association between smoking, tobacco chewing, hyperlipidemia, and obesity and ACS in younger patients, hypertesnion and positive family history of premature CAD were the only discriminatory risk factors between the two age groups. This is in agreement with other studies of similar nature [5,8,13].…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 83%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…Although our study demonstrated a stronger association between smoking, tobacco chewing, hyperlipidemia, and obesity and ACS in younger patients, hypertesnion and positive family history of premature CAD were the only discriminatory risk factors between the two age groups. This is in agreement with other studies of similar nature [5,8,13].…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 83%
“…In this study, we determined the differences in the characteristics of class I-IV risk factors and angiographic profile between younger and older patients with ACS. We selected an age cut-off of 40 y to define a premature CAD, based on previous Indian [1,11] and Indian subcontinent studies [2,[5][6][7].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…In our study, the mean age of the patients in Group I (DM with CAD) was 54.73 (±8.94) years as compared to 56.59±13.63 years and 58.01±12.9 years, studies done by Assiri et al (2012) and Al-Saif et al (2011). It was 52.0±8.6 years in a study reported by Siddique et al (2010) and 56.6 years by Ullah M et al, (2011) in Bangladesh. 21,[23][24][25] Mean total count of WBC was found 9.90 ± (1.91) x 10 9 /L in Group I and 8.66 ± (1.37) x 10 9 /L in Group II.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 98%