2018
DOI: 10.1037/pag0000235
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Age-related differences in associative memory: Empirical evidence and theoretical perspectives.

Abstract: Systematic research and anecdotal evidence both indicate declines in episodic memory in older adults in good health without dementia-related disorders. Several hypotheses have been proposed to explain these age-related changes in episodic memory, some of which attribute such declines to a deterioration in associative memory. The current special issue of on Age-Related Differences in Associative Memory includes 16 articles by top researchers in the area of memory and aging. Their contributions provide a wealth … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4

Citation Types

3
37
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 42 publications
(41 citation statements)
references
References 48 publications
3
37
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The striking similarity between memory difficulties in ASD and those seen in healthy aging adults [Craik & Anderson, 1999; Craik & Salthouse, 2000; De Beni et al, 2013; Klencklen, Lavenex, Bradner, & Lavenex, 2017; Naveh‐Benjamin, 2000; Naveh‐Benjamin & Mayr, 2018; Tse, Crabtree, Islam, & Stott, 2019], led Bowler and colleagues [Bowler, Gardiner, & Gaigg, 2007; Bowler et al, 2004] to propose an “ aging analogy ” for memory in autism. The analogy has been supported by cross‐sectional studies showing fewer age‐related differences in memory between older and younger ASD adults compared to neurotypical controls [Lever & Geurts, 2016; Lever, Werkle‐Bergner, Branmaier, Ridderinkhof, & Geurts, 2015; Ring, Gaigg, & Bowler, 2016; Roestorf, 2018 but see Geurts & Vissers, 2012; Powell, Klinger, & Klinger, 2017 for more mixed results].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The striking similarity between memory difficulties in ASD and those seen in healthy aging adults [Craik & Anderson, 1999; Craik & Salthouse, 2000; De Beni et al, 2013; Klencklen, Lavenex, Bradner, & Lavenex, 2017; Naveh‐Benjamin, 2000; Naveh‐Benjamin & Mayr, 2018; Tse, Crabtree, Islam, & Stott, 2019], led Bowler and colleagues [Bowler, Gardiner, & Gaigg, 2007; Bowler et al, 2004] to propose an “ aging analogy ” for memory in autism. The analogy has been supported by cross‐sectional studies showing fewer age‐related differences in memory between older and younger ASD adults compared to neurotypical controls [Lever & Geurts, 2016; Lever, Werkle‐Bergner, Branmaier, Ridderinkhof, & Geurts, 2015; Ring, Gaigg, & Bowler, 2016; Roestorf, 2018 but see Geurts & Vissers, 2012; Powell, Klinger, & Klinger, 2017 for more mixed results].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Bowler et al [2014] interpreted these findings as supporting Bowler et al's [2011] argument for a relational binding deficit in ASD mentioned above and which echoes accounts of the memory difficulties faced by healthy older neurotypical individuals. Prominent among these is Naveh‐Benjamin's associative deficit hypothesis (ADH) [Naveh‐Benjamin, 2000; Peterson & Naveh‐Benjamin, 2016; Naveh‐Benjamin & Mayr, 2018], which sees age‐related declines in declarative episodic memory as the results of a diminished capacity to bind together the defining elements of an episode. Although considerable research supports the ADH [see Old & Naveh‐Benjamin, 2008 for review; Bastin et al, 2013; Craik, Luo, & Sakuta, 2010; Wang, Dew, & Giovanello, 2010], Kirmsse, Zimmer, and Ecker [2018] note that age‐related associative difficulties seem to be less in evidence in studies that use working memory (WM) [Baddeley, 2012] or short‐term memory (STM) paradigms possibly because of procedural differences between methods used to test WM/STM and LTM [see also Allen, 2015].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The equivalence (or lack thereof) between older adults and young adults with divided attention has been a topic of ongoing investigation. Some studies reported distinct differences between older adults and young adults with divided attention (e.g., Kilb & Naveh-Benjamin, 2007;Smyth & Naveh-Benjamin, 2016), whereas others found that divided attention young adults behaved similar to older adults (e.g., Castel & Craik, 2003;Jacoby, 1999;Kelley & Sahakyan, 2003), and the issue remains unclear (Naveh- Benjamin & Mayr, 2018). Our recent findings with young adults demonstrate that divided attention at encoding interacts with LSE both in free recall and in recognition (Sahakyan & Malmberg, 2018).…”
mentioning
confidence: 68%
“…Significant cognitive changes can be also observed in the aging process, such as slowing cognitive processing, reduced attention span, and decrease in working, prospective and episodic memory (Moraes, Moraes, & Lima, 2010;Naveh-Benjamin, & Mayr, 2018;Xavier, 2006;Yassuda & Paulo, 2010). Studying cognition is of interest to many researchers seeking to understand the declines, gain or maintenance of cognitive functions.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%