“…From the 28 remaining studies, eighteen were excluded during full-text reading, with the following reasons: did not assess third molars (Marcondes et al, 1965;Carvalho et al, 1990;Eid et al, 2002;Kurita et al, 2007;Maia et al, 2010;Fernandes et al, 2011;Cericato et al, 2016;Lavez et al, 2017;Benedicto et al, 2018;Lopes et al, 2018;Machado et al, 2018;Mazzili et al, 2018;Mazzili et al, 2019); did not distinguish third molars analysis from the other teeth (Franco et al, 2013); combine dental and skeletal parameters for age estimation (Azevedo et al, 2018); did not sample Brazilians (Sharma et al, 2018); did not include adolescents (Luz et al, 2019) and not found even after deep search (Rosa, 1969). Ten studies were included in the qualitative analysis (Carneiro et al, 2010;Oliveira et al, 2012;Lopez et al, 2013;Deitos et al, 2015;Soares et al, 2015;Tonin et al, 2016;Ribeiro et al, 2018;Nóbrega et al, 2019;Ramaswami et al, 2020;Sousa et al, 2020). Figure 1 shows the literature review process up to the inclusion and analysis of the eligible studies.…”