2016
DOI: 10.1111/pme.12927
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Age Differences in Decoding Pain from the Facial Expression of Healthy Individuals and Patients with Dementia

Abstract: Age does not only lead to a decline in recognition of facial expressions of emotions but age also affects the quality of observational pain recognition in others. However, given that older observers' performance was only slightly reduced, clearly suggests that older caregivers are surely not at risk of becoming visual agnostic for the pain in others.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
5
0
1

Year Published

2017
2017
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

2
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 29 publications
1
5
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…This finding is consistent with prior research (e.g., Horgas and Dunn 2001;Weiner et al 1999). Observers' greater rating correspondence for younger adults' pain may be due to an "own-age bias" (Ebner et al 2011), although there is research that is inconsistent with this explanation (Lautenbacher et al 2016). As an alternative explanation, age-related facial changes such as wrinkling could have confounded the correspondence of pain ratings for older adults (Borod et al 2004;Ebner and Johnson 2009;Hess et al 2012;Malatesta et al 1987;Murphy et al 2010;Riediger et al 2011).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 88%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…This finding is consistent with prior research (e.g., Horgas and Dunn 2001;Weiner et al 1999). Observers' greater rating correspondence for younger adults' pain may be due to an "own-age bias" (Ebner et al 2011), although there is research that is inconsistent with this explanation (Lautenbacher et al 2016). As an alternative explanation, age-related facial changes such as wrinkling could have confounded the correspondence of pain ratings for older adults (Borod et al 2004;Ebner and Johnson 2009;Hess et al 2012;Malatesta et al 1987;Murphy et al 2010;Riediger et al 2011).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 88%
“…Observer gender may influence observational pain ratings (e.g., Robinson and Wise 2003;Vigil and Coulombe 2011). It has also been suggested that there are age-related changes in emotion and pain recognition when viewing facial expressions such that younger observers may be better at rating others' pain (Lautenbacher et al 2016;Ortega and Phillips 2008;Ruffman et al 2008). Perhaps a more diverse (e.g., with respect to age) sample of participant observers would yield effects based on demographic characteristics, which is something that could not be determined in this study because almost all observers were younger adults.…”
Section: Limitations and Future Directionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Reasons for the persistent underestimation of pain are not clear (32). Intrapersonal factors found to influence perception and assessment of pain include personal factors like gender (87)(88)(89) and age (90)(91)(92), psychological and cognitive factors (88,89,(93)(94)(95)(96), and prior personal and professional experience with pain (88, 89).…”
Section: Pain Assessmentmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Nevertheless, pain expressions are accurately discriminated from other facial expressions by younger observers (Kappesser et al, 2006;Simon et al, 2008). Older observers' overall ability to judge pain in others seems to be maintained (Lautenbacher et al, 2016), until at least 80 years of age, though this needs to be further tested empirically.…”
Section: Observers' Characteristicsmentioning
confidence: 94%