1990
DOI: 10.1016/0009-2541(90)90139-x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Age dating of individual grains of uraninite in rocks from electron microprobe analyses

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

2
60
0
3

Year Published

1993
1993
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 137 publications
(67 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
2
60
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…Dating of uraninite shows an average age of 14.2± 0.2 Ma (9 measurements). Similar average ages have been obtained from alternative methods of uraninite age calculations, namely 14.5± 0.3 Ma of Ranchin (1968), 12.5± 0.5 Ma of CameronSchiman (1978), and 13.9±0.3 Ma of Bowles (1990).…”
Section: Chemical Dating Of Monazite and Uraninitesupporting
confidence: 75%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Dating of uraninite shows an average age of 14.2± 0.2 Ma (9 measurements). Similar average ages have been obtained from alternative methods of uraninite age calculations, namely 14.5± 0.3 Ma of Ranchin (1968), 12.5± 0.5 Ma of CameronSchiman (1978), and 13.9±0.3 Ma of Bowles (1990).…”
Section: Chemical Dating Of Monazite and Uraninitesupporting
confidence: 75%
“…Spot analyses of monazite and uraninite were corrected for mutual interferences and then the weighted average of apparent ages were calculated following the statistical method of Montel et al (1996). Moreover, an average age of uraninite was also calculated by the alternative methods of Ranchin (1968), Cameron-Schiman (1978) and Bowles (1990). …”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Assuming that all Pb in thorianite are radiogenic and partial lead -loss did not occur (e.g., Bowles, 1990), the total U -Th -Pb age of thorianite can be determined. We mainly follow the theoretical basis of electron microprobe dating shown in publications (e.g., Bowles, 1990;Suzuki and Adachi, 1991), but we do not follow the algorithm in p. 49 of Bowles (1990) who searched a root at a 1 Ma step.…”
Section: Mineral Compositions Of the Ms Inclusion And Thorianite Agementioning
confidence: 99%
“…We mainly follow the theoretical basis of electron microprobe dating shown in publications (e.g., Bowles, 1990;Suzuki and Adachi, 1991), but we do not follow the algorithm in p. 49 of Bowles (1990) who searched a root at a 1 Ma step. We have determined the root by the Newton -Raphson method.…”
Section: Mineral Compositions Of the Ms Inclusion And Thorianite Agementioning
confidence: 99%