2017
DOI: 10.1016/j.jaging.2017.03.001
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Age ascription as a resource and a source of resistance – An interactional study of health professionals' castings of patients into the category ‘old’

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0
4

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 43 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 30 publications
0
5
0
4
Order By: Relevance
“…Around 18% of the studies drew upon psychosocial dehumanization theories, particularly the dual model of dehumanization (Adams, Case, Fitness, & Stevenson, 2017; Caesens, Stinglhamber, Demoulin, & DeWilde, 2017; Haslam, 2006; Martinez, 2014; Miron, McFadden, Nazario, & Buelow, 2017; Piccoli, Fantoni, Foroni, Bianchi, & Carnaghi, 2017; Sakalaki, Richardson, & Fousiani, 2017; Zhang, Chan, Xia, Tian, & Zhu, 2017), or the infrahumanization theory (Leyens, 2009; Pavon & Vaes, 2017; Trifiletti, DiBernado, Falvo, & Capozza, 2014; Vaes & Muratore, 2013), to analyze determinants and consequences of other-dehumanization. Discursive approaches were used to explore dehumanized representations or metaphors of the body in the press (Coveney, Nerlich, & Martin, 2009; Naslund, 2017; Potts & Semino, 2017) or in participants’ discourses (Anderson, Bresnahan, & DeAngelis, 2014; Dykes, 2005; Estrada-Mesa, Muñoz-Echavarría, & Cardona-Arias, 2016; Lauri, 2009; Schuster, Beune, & Stronks, 2011; Walker, 2012). Two studies used Social Representations Theory (Moscovici, 1984) to explore attitudes toward organ donation (Lauri, 2009) and health professionals’ dehumanizing representations about people who are transgender (Lefkowitz & Mannel, 2017; Table 3).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…Around 18% of the studies drew upon psychosocial dehumanization theories, particularly the dual model of dehumanization (Adams, Case, Fitness, & Stevenson, 2017; Caesens, Stinglhamber, Demoulin, & DeWilde, 2017; Haslam, 2006; Martinez, 2014; Miron, McFadden, Nazario, & Buelow, 2017; Piccoli, Fantoni, Foroni, Bianchi, & Carnaghi, 2017; Sakalaki, Richardson, & Fousiani, 2017; Zhang, Chan, Xia, Tian, & Zhu, 2017), or the infrahumanization theory (Leyens, 2009; Pavon & Vaes, 2017; Trifiletti, DiBernado, Falvo, & Capozza, 2014; Vaes & Muratore, 2013), to analyze determinants and consequences of other-dehumanization. Discursive approaches were used to explore dehumanized representations or metaphors of the body in the press (Coveney, Nerlich, & Martin, 2009; Naslund, 2017; Potts & Semino, 2017) or in participants’ discourses (Anderson, Bresnahan, & DeAngelis, 2014; Dykes, 2005; Estrada-Mesa, Muñoz-Echavarría, & Cardona-Arias, 2016; Lauri, 2009; Schuster, Beune, & Stronks, 2011; Walker, 2012). Two studies used Social Representations Theory (Moscovici, 1984) to explore attitudes toward organ donation (Lauri, 2009) and health professionals’ dehumanizing representations about people who are transgender (Lefkowitz & Mannel, 2017; Table 3).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Studies also showed how the metaphor of the “victim” was used by health care professionals to describe end-of-life patients (Potts & Semino, 2017) and older people (Naslund, 2017), but with different implications. Again, the same metaphor was used to endorse distinct representations: End-of-life patients were presented as victims of illness who lacked the ability to fight back, but still held emotions and beliefs; older people were mainly represented as victims of age, with diminished desires, capacity of decision-making, and behavioral intentionality.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Kategoria-analyysia soveltavissa tutkimuksissa toistuvat ikääntymiseen liittyvät negatiiviset kulttuuriset stereotypiat ja mielikuvat. Niissä osoitetaan kuitenkin myös haastateltavan aktiivinen rooli kulttuuristen kategorioiden neuvot-telijana, haastajana tai vastustajana (Näslund 2017;Jolanki 2004).…”
Section: Aineiston Analyysiunclassified