“…Around 18% of the studies drew upon psychosocial dehumanization theories, particularly the dual model of dehumanization (Adams, Case, Fitness, & Stevenson, 2017; Caesens, Stinglhamber, Demoulin, & DeWilde, 2017; Haslam, 2006; Martinez, 2014; Miron, McFadden, Nazario, & Buelow, 2017; Piccoli, Fantoni, Foroni, Bianchi, & Carnaghi, 2017; Sakalaki, Richardson, & Fousiani, 2017; Zhang, Chan, Xia, Tian, & Zhu, 2017), or the infrahumanization theory (Leyens, 2009; Pavon & Vaes, 2017; Trifiletti, DiBernado, Falvo, & Capozza, 2014; Vaes & Muratore, 2013), to analyze determinants and consequences of other-dehumanization. Discursive approaches were used to explore dehumanized representations or metaphors of the body in the press (Coveney, Nerlich, & Martin, 2009; Naslund, 2017; Potts & Semino, 2017) or in participants’ discourses (Anderson, Bresnahan, & DeAngelis, 2014; Dykes, 2005; Estrada-Mesa, Muñoz-Echavarría, & Cardona-Arias, 2016; Lauri, 2009; Schuster, Beune, & Stronks, 2011; Walker, 2012). Two studies used Social Representations Theory (Moscovici, 1984) to explore attitudes toward organ donation (Lauri, 2009) and health professionals’ dehumanizing representations about people who are transgender (Lefkowitz & Mannel, 2017; Table 3).…”