1963
DOI: 10.1001/archotol.1963.00750010399008
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Age and Sex Differences in Pure-Tone Thresholds: Survey of Hearing Levels From 18 to 65 Years

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

8
27
0

Year Published

1974
1974
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 146 publications
(35 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
8
27
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Although the sexual difference of BC hearing is still controversial [20,21], the majority of studies have reported that male BC thresholds are worse than female BC thresholds, particularly at high frequencies [22][23][24]. This has been attributed to higher chance of noise exposure among male subjects [23]. The present results follow those of previous studies.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 88%
“…Although the sexual difference of BC hearing is still controversial [20,21], the majority of studies have reported that male BC thresholds are worse than female BC thresholds, particularly at high frequencies [22][23][24]. This has been attributed to higher chance of noise exposure among male subjects [23]. The present results follow those of previous studies.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 88%
“…Almost identical relations were observed between the mean frequency-specific thresholds for the LEs and REs in our earlier study with 3,430 veterans [28]. A common characteristic of largescale studies, including those that are population based, is lower (better) high-frequency thresholds in the RE than in the LE [24,[33][34][35][36][37][38][39][40][41][42]. Finally, from the mean threshold data in Table 1, there is no evidence of an audiometric notch at 4,000 Hz, the reason for which will become apparent as the data analyses develop in the subsequent sections.…”
Section: Group 1 (4000 Hz Data)supporting
confidence: 68%
“…Our data show that thresholds are better in males than females from 250 to 1,000 Hz, whereas from 2,000 to 8,000 Hz, thresholds are better in females than males. Our findings confirm the 'gender-reversal' phenomenon noted in several previous studies [9,10,[19][20][21][22] . Jerger et al [10] reviewed large-scale surveys of hearing and found that above 1,000 Hz males showed greater average loss than females, whereas below 1,000 Hz females showed greater average loss than males.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 93%
“…Analyses were stratified by gender to account for differences in results between men and women. Gender differences in the severity, configuration and prevalence of hearing loss have been identified in previous research [9,10] .…”
mentioning
confidence: 69%