2005
DOI: 10.1007/s11056-004-0761-z
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

AFFOREST sDSS: a metamodel based spatial decision support system for afforestation of agricultural land

Abstract: Abstract. The concept and structure of the Spatial Decision Support System AFFOREST sDSS dealing with environmental performance (EP) of afforestation on agricultural land in northwestern Europe, is presented. EP is defined in terms of three environmental impact categories: (1) carbon sequestration (2) groundwater recharge and (3) nitrate leaching. The core of the sDSS is a raster based geographical database which allows for queries addressing 14 types of questions on where, how and how long to afforest in orde… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
16
0

Year Published

2007
2007
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 36 publications
(21 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
1
16
0
Order By: Relevance
“…likely outcomes of alternatives from which a DSS can identify the most preferable one to maximise different user-defined objectives (see e.g Gilliams et al, 2005). In absence of a genuine DSS, stand alone simulation tools often include a user interface with attractive output visualization features to provide decision support ( Fig.…”
Section: Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…likely outcomes of alternatives from which a DSS can identify the most preferable one to maximise different user-defined objectives (see e.g Gilliams et al, 2005). In absence of a genuine DSS, stand alone simulation tools often include a user interface with attractive output visualization features to provide decision support ( Fig.…”
Section: Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…On the other hand, in strategic planning decisions, such as the strategic choice between maximum sustained yield or close-to-nature management, multicriteria decision analysis methods (MCDA) have been used. MCDA methods have drawn considerable attention and promising examples for successful integration in DSS have been presented (e.g., Lexer et al, 2005;Gilliams et al, 2005;Vacik et al, 2007;Twery et al, 2005). For instance, Lexer et al (2005) developed a DSS to support the forestry staff of extension services in southern Austria in preparing informed recommendations for forest management to small private landowners based on owner's goal preferences.…”
Section: Trends In Decision Makingmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…A recent alternative approach is to build a metamodel (or surrogate model), which is a new computationally efficient model that gives almost the same results as the PBM but makes it easier to carry out sensitivity and uncertainty analyses (Faivre et al 2013). The metamodel approach has recently started to be used in forest modeling to develop faster modules for light interception (Marie and Simioni 2014), biomass prediction (de-Miguel et al 2014), or land use changes (Gilliams et al 2005;Sieber et al 2013.). In addition to facilitating sensitivity analysis, a metamodel of a tree-scale PBM could give simple modules of carbon and water fluxes that are easier to couple with a tree-scale allocation scheme for simulating individual-tree growth.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%