2016
DOI: 10.1139/cjfr-2015-0173
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Sensitivity and uncertainty analysis of the carbon and water fluxes at the tree scale inEucalyptusplantations using a metamodeling approach

Abstract: Understanding the consequences of changes in climatic and biological drivers on tree carbon and water fluxes is essential in forestry. Using a metamodeling approach, sensitivity and uncertainty analyses were carried out for a tree-scale model (MAESPA) to isolate the effects of climate, morphological and physiological traits, and intertree competition on the absorption of photosynthetically active radiation (APAR), gross primary production (GPP), transpiration (TR), light use efficiency (LUE), and water use eff… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
8
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 75 publications
1
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The balance between the simplicity and accuracy of this metamodel is because the LAD can be considered as a proxy for within crown foliage aggregation, which was determined -along with the LAI -as the most important characteristic to model light penetration by Sampson and Smith (1993). The metamodels for yielded R 2 and RMSE similar to those found in Christina et al (2016): R 2 of 0.87 compared to 0.87 and 0.94 for shade tree and coffee respectively in our study, and an RMSE of 0.20 gC MJ -1 compared to 0.25 and 0.09 (shade tree and coffee resp.) in our study.…”
Section: Metamodelssupporting
confidence: 83%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The balance between the simplicity and accuracy of this metamodel is because the LAD can be considered as a proxy for within crown foliage aggregation, which was determined -along with the LAI -as the most important characteristic to model light penetration by Sampson and Smith (1993). The metamodels for yielded R 2 and RMSE similar to those found in Christina et al (2016): R 2 of 0.87 compared to 0.87 and 0.94 for shade tree and coffee respectively in our study, and an RMSE of 0.20 gC MJ -1 compared to 0.25 and 0.09 (shade tree and coffee resp.) in our study.…”
Section: Metamodelssupporting
confidence: 83%
“…spatial heterogeneity) into one empirical equation, becoming an input for the next crop model. Metamodels are generally used to better understand the processes at stake in a model and to assess model sensitivity and uncertainty (Christina et al, 2016;Faivre et al, 2013), for the purpose of optimization (Razavi et al, 2012), or to make faster and reasonably accurate predictions for a given variable that is usually computed by a time-consuming model, but with fewer simulation errors compared to simpler models (Marie et al, 2014). Metamodels are often used as an efficient and simple tool to combine models at different time and/or space scales without running the finer-scale model iteratively.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…) and in a sensitivity analysis of the simulated water use efficiency with MAESPA model (Christina et al . ).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…Furthermore, detailed 3D light‐interception models in combination with fine‐field NPP measurements could be helpful in calibrating statistical meta‐models, which are useful for scaling plot‐level results up to the regional level (e.g. Christina et al ; Vezy et al ). They also offer a tool for optimizing plot design in order to maximize several functions, such as GPP, water‐use efficiency, LUE and canopy temperature according to microclimate and shade structure.…”
Section: Importance Of Variable Light‐use Efficiency For Modellingmentioning
confidence: 99%