2017
DOI: 10.1016/j.infbeh.2017.03.008
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Affordances in the home environment for motor development: Validity and reliability for the use in daycare setting

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
11
0
1

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 43 publications
0
11
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…And, of that general context, the home environment is the most significant factor. Whereas contemporary studies have reported such findings, most samples have been limited primarily to infants and children under 5 years (e.g., Caçola, Gabbard, Santos, & Batistela, 2011;Freitas, Gabbard, Caçola, Montebelo, & Santos, 2013; Miquelote, Santos, Caçola, Montebelo, & Gabbard, 2012;Müller et al, 2017;Saccani, Valentini, Pereira, Müller, & Gabbard, 2013). For the examination of home affordances that may contribute to motor development (MD), several of these studies used the Affordances in the Home Environment for MD; either the infant version (3-18 months;e.g., Caçola, Gabbard, Montebelo, & Santos, 2015) or the one designed for children 18-42 months (e.g., Rodrigues, Saraiva, & Gabbard, 2005).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…And, of that general context, the home environment is the most significant factor. Whereas contemporary studies have reported such findings, most samples have been limited primarily to infants and children under 5 years (e.g., Caçola, Gabbard, Santos, & Batistela, 2011;Freitas, Gabbard, Caçola, Montebelo, & Santos, 2013; Miquelote, Santos, Caçola, Montebelo, & Gabbard, 2012;Müller et al, 2017;Saccani, Valentini, Pereira, Müller, & Gabbard, 2013). For the examination of home affordances that may contribute to motor development (MD), several of these studies used the Affordances in the Home Environment for MD; either the infant version (3-18 months;e.g., Caçola, Gabbard, Montebelo, & Santos, 2015) or the one designed for children 18-42 months (e.g., Rodrigues, Saraiva, & Gabbard, 2005).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…When analyzing the characteristics of the productions that used the instruments AHEMD-SR and AHEMD-IS, an increase in publications was noticed as of 2010, which can be related to the studies on creation, validation, and adaptation of instruments [6][7][8]11,[29][30][31][32][33][34] which instigate the scientific community interest to apply them and publish the results.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Analyses were conducted in SPSS R Version 24 and Mplus version 8.0 (Muthén andMuthén, 1998-2017). In both studies, sample differences in the settings, practices, and beliefs were tested using χ 2 tests, regression analysis, and MANOVA.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The relations between beliefs and practices within the first study were analyzed using multigroup structural equation modeling (Kline, 2005). For this analysis missing data were dealt with by using full information maximum likelihood estimation in Mplus (Muthén andMuthén, 1998-2017). For all other analyses listwise deletion was used.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation