1995
DOI: 10.1016/0165-0327(95)00021-e
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Affective valence of words, explicit and implicit memory in clinical depression

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

4
47
1
8

Year Published

2003
2003
2011
2011

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 91 publications
(60 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
4
47
1
8
Order By: Relevance
“…However, due to the high degree of experimental control, an increasing number of studies have started to use word-based stimulus materials for studying the influence of affective content on memory processes (e.g., Danion, Kauffmann-Muller, Grangé, Zimmermann, & Greth, 1995;Kuchinke et al, 2006;Maratos, Allan, & Rugg, 2000;Richardson, Strange, & Dolan, 2004;Siegle, Ingram, & Matt, 2002;Võ et al, 2008;Windmann & Kutas, 2001). Although emotional arousal mediated by verbal stimuli seems to be less pronounced, as compared with highly arousing pictorial stimulus materials (Phelps, LaBar, & Spencer, 1997), there is evidence for effects of emotional arousal in word processing as well (e.g., Hofmann, Kuchinke, Tamm, Võ, & Jacobs, 2009;Kissler, Assadollahi, & Herbert, 2006;Kissler, Herbert, Peyk, & Junghöfer, 2007;Scott, O'Donnel, Leuthold, & Sereno, 2009;Thomas & LaBar, 2005).…”
Section: Description Of the Databasementioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, due to the high degree of experimental control, an increasing number of studies have started to use word-based stimulus materials for studying the influence of affective content on memory processes (e.g., Danion, Kauffmann-Muller, Grangé, Zimmermann, & Greth, 1995;Kuchinke et al, 2006;Maratos, Allan, & Rugg, 2000;Richardson, Strange, & Dolan, 2004;Siegle, Ingram, & Matt, 2002;Võ et al, 2008;Windmann & Kutas, 2001). Although emotional arousal mediated by verbal stimuli seems to be less pronounced, as compared with highly arousing pictorial stimulus materials (Phelps, LaBar, & Spencer, 1997), there is evidence for effects of emotional arousal in word processing as well (e.g., Hofmann, Kuchinke, Tamm, Võ, & Jacobs, 2009;Kissler, Assadollahi, & Herbert, 2006;Kissler, Herbert, Peyk, & Junghöfer, 2007;Scott, O'Donnel, Leuthold, & Sereno, 2009;Thomas & LaBar, 2005).…”
Section: Description Of the Databasementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Prominent examples are the emotional Stroop (Dresler, Mériau, Heekeren, & van der Meer, 2009;Phaf & Kan, 2007;Thomas, Johnstone, & Gonsalvez, 2007), the recognition memory test (Grider & Malmberg, 2008;Võ et al, 2008;Zimmermann & Kelley, 2010), the lexical decision task (LDT, Kuchinke, Võ, Hofmann, & Jacobs, 2007;Schacht & Sommer, 2009;Scott, O'Donnell, Leuthold, & Sereno, 2009), naming (Estes & Adelman, 2008;Simpson, Snyder, Gusnard, & Raichle, 2001), verb generation (e.g., Simpson et al, 2001), or word-stem completion (Danion, Kauffmann-Muller, Grangé, Zimmermann, & Greth, 1995). However, because numerous variables are known to influence visual word processing (Graf, Nagler, & Jacobs, 2005), well-controlled and reliable emotion-inducing stimulus material is necessary in order to produce interpretable effects.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, particularly for recognition memory, several studies report no beneficial effect of emotion on either recognition hit rate [18,32] or recognition accuracy (hits-false alarms, [33,40,53]). Thus, better recognition of emotional items may be due to a shift in response criterion, 'an emotion-induced recognition bias', rather than an actual superior discriminative recognition memory [8,30,53]. On the other hand, Ochsner [36] reported genuinely better discrimination particularly for unpleasant than for neutral pictures.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%