2018
DOI: 10.1016/j.eti.2017.12.006
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Aerobic granulation: A recent development on the biological treatment of pulp and paper wastewater

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
20
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
4
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 51 publications
(22 citation statements)
references
References 75 publications
1
20
0
Order By: Relevance
“…EPS is the major contributor to membrane fouling during POME treatment with an average composition of 52% of the total foulants [50]. Also, this is in accordance to the reports on the direct relationship that exists between the EPS contained in the mixed liquor with the fouling rate [255], specific flux [256], critical flux [128], and membrane filtration performance [257]. They all confirmed that EPS constitutes majorly in the deposited foulants.…”
Section: Organic Foulants Generated During Pome Treatmentsupporting
confidence: 87%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…EPS is the major contributor to membrane fouling during POME treatment with an average composition of 52% of the total foulants [50]. Also, this is in accordance to the reports on the direct relationship that exists between the EPS contained in the mixed liquor with the fouling rate [255], specific flux [256], critical flux [128], and membrane filtration performance [257]. They all confirmed that EPS constitutes majorly in the deposited foulants.…”
Section: Organic Foulants Generated During Pome Treatmentsupporting
confidence: 87%
“…Membrane fouling could cause gross deterioration of the system performance in terms of filtration and operational energy utilization, as highlighted earlier. Therefore, the need to control the fouling is indispensable and this justified the previous studies reported on this critical area [67,110,161,[255][256][257][258]. The efforts devoted by the researchers have yielded some improvements such as membrane fouling control strategies and filtration.…”
Section: Mbr Major Drawbacksmentioning
confidence: 91%
“…Granular activated sludge systems such as self-immobilization methods have been widely applied in the area of wastewater treatment and used for the reduction of a number of organic compounds, such as phenols, alcohol and acetate. Compared to conventional sludge, self-immobilization of activated sludge has several advantages including low operation cost, good control over flocculent sludge growth and the elimination of the sedimentation tank and recycling pumps [49,94]. Granular activated sludge was used for the reduction of COD from several wastewater streams under aerobic and anaerobic systems and achieved high removal efficiency, as shown in Table 5.…”
Section: Immobilization Of Biomassmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This system is well suited for cost effective treatment of the dairy wastewater and it shows an efficient removal of every nutrient and organic compounds present in the dairy effluents [54]. The aerobic granular sludge treatment is efficient than the normal activated sludge system due to its strong resistance against shocks, elevated settle ability, less toxicity and higher biomass recovery [55]. The aerobic granular sludge system is used to treat the industrial effluent containing around 100-1000 mg L -1 of suspended solids in the effluent.…”
Section: Activated Sludge Processmentioning
confidence: 99%