2017
DOI: 10.5433/1679-0359.2017v38n2p943
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Aerial parts of cassava as partial replacement for feed concentrates in the diet of lambs raised in semi-confinement

Abstract: This study aimed to evaluate the performance and economic viability of including the aerial parts of cassava (PAM) in the feed of semi-confined lambs for partial reduction of food concentrates. Fifty-six sheep, including males and females of the Pantaneira genetic group weighing 18.84 ± 2.02 kg on an average were used. The experiment was conducted in a factorial randomized complete block design with four treatments, each with seven females and seven males. Each group of 14 animals received one of four treatmen… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

1
0
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 14 publications
(14 reference statements)
1
0
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The mean DM of clone 117/09 was statistically higher than those of the other clones evaluated, both with (25.5%), and without (33.8 %) pruning. The results obtained in this study are similar to those reported in other studies (FERNANDES et al, 2016;SALLES et al, 2016;HUE et al, 2012;MOREIRA et al, 2017;PEREIRA et al, 2017) for cassava DM, with values between 21.2 and 30%, and within the values suggested by Fluck et al (2017) for good conservation of the aerial part of cassava in the form of silage. Table 4.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 92%
“…The mean DM of clone 117/09 was statistically higher than those of the other clones evaluated, both with (25.5%), and without (33.8 %) pruning. The results obtained in this study are similar to those reported in other studies (FERNANDES et al, 2016;SALLES et al, 2016;HUE et al, 2012;MOREIRA et al, 2017;PEREIRA et al, 2017) for cassava DM, with values between 21.2 and 30%, and within the values suggested by Fluck et al (2017) for good conservation of the aerial part of cassava in the form of silage. Table 4.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 92%