Advances in offender assessment and rehabilitation: Contributions of the risk–needs–responsivity approach

Ogloff, James R. P.; Davis, Michael R.

doi:10.1080/10683160410001662735

Cited by 75 publications

(50 citation statements)

References 19 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Unclassified

Order By: Relevance

“…Le ciblage de facteurs psychologiques « généraux » ou de facteurs spécifiques, mais qui n'ont aucun rapport avec le comportement criminel, une proposition qui est habituellement séduisante pour bon nombre de cliniciens en santé mentale (Ogloff et Davis, 2004), n'entraîne malheureusement pas une réduction des risques de récidive . Lorsque les facteurs criminogènes sont ciblés de manière appropriée, on constate une amélioration considérable des résultats (c'est-à-dire une réduction de la récidive ; McGuire, 2001b) ; tandis que l'inclusion de cibles inappropriées risque de réduire l'efficacité du traitement .…”

Section: Pour Traiter Quels Problèmes (Quoi ?)unclassified

“…Cette écono-mie des « coûts indirects » n'est pas toujours incluse dans les calculs discutés ci-dessus (Brown, 2001) 5 . Tous ces résultats montrent donc l'importance d'adhérer aux principes risque-besoins-réceptivité lorsqu'on élabore et implante des interventions correctionnelles (Ogloff et Davis, 2004 ;Hollin et Palmer, 2006b …”

Section: Avec Quel Type D'intervention (Comment ?)unclassified

See 1 more Smart Citation

Le traitement correctionnel fondé sur des données probantes : une recension

Cortoni

Lafortune

2009

crimino

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Résumé Contrairement à la perspective « Nothing works » de Martinson (1974), l’approche « What works ? » du traitement correctionnel s’est centrée sur la possibilité que le traitement correctionnel soit efficace dans la réduction de la récidive criminelle des délinquants. Les preuves empiriques examinées dans le présent article corroborent le fait que l’application des principes risque-besoins-réceptivité d’Andrews et Bonta (2006) donnent les bases d’un modèle efficace de réhabilitation. Pourtant, malgré les grands progrès réalisés dans le développement et la mise en oeuvre d’un traitement correctionnel fondé sur des données probantes, il subsiste des sphères qui nécessitent un approfondissement. Dans cet article, trois questions souvent négligées relativement à la réhabilitation du délinquant sont aussi examinées, à savoir la nécessité de prendre en considération les enjeux motivationnels chez les délinquants, l’importance des compétences et attitudes du personnel, et la nécessité de documenter et d’évaluer continuellement les pratiques de réhabilitation.

show abstract

Section: Pour Traiter Quels Problèmes (Quoi ?)unclassified

Section: Avec Quel Type D'intervention (Comment ?)unclassified

Le traitement correctionnel fondé sur des données probantes : une recension

Cortoni

Lafortune

2009

crimino

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…Furthermore, as countries saw themselves faced with ever-increasing amounts of money to be spent on punishment-oriented policies, the possibility to reduce re-offending through rehabilitation became politically attractive (Ogloff & Davis, 2004). Consequently, a number of countries across North America, Europe and Oceania adopted the RNR model (Ward, Melser, & Yates, 2007).…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…For offender rehabilitation to be consistent with the RNR model, knowledge of an offender's risk level and criminogenic needs is essential (Andrews, 2006;Andrews & Bonta, 2010;Ogloff & Davis, 2004). Risk and need assessment should therefore be closely integrated with rehabilitation efforts (Wong, Gordon, & Gu, 2007); risk assessment will guide the as-signment of offenders to different levels of treatment intensity, while assessing needs will inform what criminogenic factors need to be targeted by offering relevant behavioral interventions (Hollin, 2002;McGuire, 2002).…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…Within the RNR framework the assessment of risk and needs is usually done by using one of several structured clinical risk assessment instruments (for a review of risk and need assessment see Andrews et al, 2006). In justice systems that adopted the RNR model, the most widely used instruments Ogloff & Davis, 2004) Although the predictive validity of the English-language instruments has been extensively studied Brennan et al, 2009;Debidin, 2009), research on interrater reliability is either lacking-as appears to be the case for COMPAS (Brennan, Dieterich, & Ehret, 2007)-or suffers from a number of limitations. Andrews et al (2004), for instance, report on the inter-rater reliability of the LS/CMI based on two (unpublished) studies.…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 1 more Smart Citation

Reevaluating Interrater Reliability in Offender Risk Assessment

Knaap

Leenarts

Born

et al. 2010

Crime & Delinquency

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Reevaluating inter-rater reliability in offender risk assessment van der Knaap, Leontien; Leenarts, L.E.W.; Born, M.Ph.; Oosterveld, P. Published in:Crime and Delinquency Publication date: 2012 Link to publication Citation for published version (APA):van der Knaap, L. M., Leenarts, L. E. W., Born, M. P., & Oosterveld, P. (2012). Reevaluating inter-rater reliability in offender risk assessment. Crime and Delinquency, 58(1), 147-163. General rightsCopyright and moral rights for the publications made accessible in the public portal are retained by the authors and/or other copyright owners and it is a condition of accessing publications that users recognise and abide by the legal requirements associated with these rights.-Users may download and print one copy of any publication from the public portal for the purpose of private study or research -You may not further distribute the material or use it for any profit-making activity or commercial gain -You may freely distribute the URL identifying the publication in the public portal Take down policyIf you believe that this document breaches copyright, please contact us providing details, and we will remove access to the work immediately and investigate your claim. ACKNOWLEDGEMENTThe authors would like to gratefully acknowledge the help of probation officers and offenders who participated in this study. The study was conducted at the Research and Documentation Centre (WODC) of the Dutch Ministry of Justice where the first and second author were working at the time of the study. KEY WORDSOffender assessment -Risk -Inter-rater reliability -Recidivism Assessment Scales (RISc) 2 REEVALUATING INTER-RATER RELIABILITY IN OFFENDER RISK ASSESSMENT. AbstractOffender risk and needs assessment, one of the pillars of the Risk-Need-Responsivity model of offender rehabilitation, usually depends on raters assessing offender risk and needs.The few available studies of inter-rater reliability in offender risk assessment are, however, limited in the generalizability of their results. The present study examined inter-rater reliability in Dutch offender risk assessment of 38 raters who independently assessed 75 offenders.Results show substantial reliability (Tinsley & Weiss' T value ≥ .61) for risk of reconviction and moderate (T value ≥ .41) to substantial reliability for offender needs, such as accommodation, finances, or education. These results are discussed in light of a recent British study on the inter-rater reliability of a comparable risk assessment instrument. Results from the present study show similar to better reliability, leading to the conclusion that greater external validity does not negatively influence inter-rater reliability results.

show abstract

Violent Offending Treatment for Male Patients with Personality Disorder

Sainsbury

2010

Using Time, Not Doing Time

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Advances in offender assessment and rehabilitation: Contributions of the risk–needs–responsivity approach

Cited by 75 publications

References 19 publications

Le traitement correctionnel fondé sur des données probantes : une recension

Le traitement correctionnel fondé sur des données probantes : une recension

Reevaluating Interrater Reliability in Offender Risk Assessment

Violent Offending Treatment for Male Patients with Personality Disorder

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About