2009
DOI: 10.1161/circulationaha.108.809582
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Advanced Lipoprotein Testing and Subfractionation Are Clinically Useful

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
70
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 67 publications
(70 citation statements)
references
References 103 publications
(70 reference statements)
0
70
0
Order By: Relevance
“…On the other hand, one limitation attributed to this method is that the assessment of LDL and HDL particle size requires a lot of time and effort, an observation likely to discourage laboratory personnel and general practitioners from measuring LDL and HDL size in their clinical practice. Moreover, although this was not the objective of the present study, the fact that most studies have shown that LDL size (independently from the method employed for its measurement) does not add to CHD risk prediction on top of currently available (and more easily obtainable) CHD risk factors is another factor which could explain the rather rare use of LDL or HDL size measurement in clinical practice (22,23 ). A limitation attributed to the NMR technique is the fact that the reproducibility between laboratories cannot be measured because NMR characteristics of LDL or HDL particles can be measured only at Liposcience (http://www.liposcience.com), which currently does not provide the instrumentation for the method to clinical laboratories.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 91%
“…On the other hand, one limitation attributed to this method is that the assessment of LDL and HDL particle size requires a lot of time and effort, an observation likely to discourage laboratory personnel and general practitioners from measuring LDL and HDL size in their clinical practice. Moreover, although this was not the objective of the present study, the fact that most studies have shown that LDL size (independently from the method employed for its measurement) does not add to CHD risk prediction on top of currently available (and more easily obtainable) CHD risk factors is another factor which could explain the rather rare use of LDL or HDL size measurement in clinical practice (22,23 ). A limitation attributed to the NMR technique is the fact that the reproducibility between laboratories cannot be measured because NMR characteristics of LDL or HDL particles can be measured only at Liposcience (http://www.liposcience.com), which currently does not provide the instrumentation for the method to clinical laboratories.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 91%
“…However, the risk for incident CKD was not associated with LDL-C or apoB, which may be attributed to the fact that LDL-C and apoB concentrations alone do not reflect LDL particle size [19,22]. ApoB concentration reflects the number of apoB-containing atherogenic particles [19]. The LDL-C/ apoB ratio has been suggested to be a good predictor of LDL particle size and the best tool to identify patients with small dense LDL particles (phenotype B) [22].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 92%
“…In our study, baseline TG and HDL-C levels were independently associated with the development of CKD and, in particular, a higher TG/HDL-C ratio was associated with a higher risk of incident CKD. However, the risk for incident CKD was not associated with LDL-C or apoB, which may be attributed to the fact that LDL-C and apoB concentrations alone do not reflect LDL particle size [19,22]. ApoB concentration reflects the number of apoB-containing atherogenic particles [19].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…39,42 ApoA-I presents in majority of HDL particles by constituting approximately 70% of apolipoprotein content in HDL protein. 43,44 Immunoblotting study revealed that Forhidrol up-regulated ApoA-I protein in HepG2-treated cells. ApoA-I mediates cholesterol removal in RCT pathway where cholesteryl esters (CEs) bind to the apolipoproteins.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%