2016
DOI: 10.1093/jipm/pmw007
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Adoption of IPM Practices in Grape, Tree Fruit, and Nut Production in the Western United States

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3

Citation Types

0
13
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
0
13
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, our understanding of the implementation and adoption of IRM and related IPM practices is relatively limited . Previous studies and surveys on general IPM practices reveal that rates of grower adoption vary from 30% to 99% depending on region and commodity . Currently, the USDA estimates that 70% of US cropland is managed using some level of IPM; however, the use of IRM tactics is unknown.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…However, our understanding of the implementation and adoption of IRM and related IPM practices is relatively limited . Previous studies and surveys on general IPM practices reveal that rates of grower adoption vary from 30% to 99% depending on region and commodity . Currently, the USDA estimates that 70% of US cropland is managed using some level of IPM; however, the use of IRM tactics is unknown.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Currently, the USDA estimates that 70% of US cropland is managed using some level of IPM; however, the use of IRM tactics is unknown. Growers tend to adopt practices that are not risky, easy to implement, and save money, which can put some IRM and related practices at a disadvantage because many are complicated and time‐consuming to implement. Consequently, the adoption of some IPM practices have been slow to progress as compared with other agricultural technologies .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Many IPM projects and programs focus on short-term (change in knowledge) or medium-term (change in behavior) impacts and have documented greater knowledge of and adoption of IPM practices (Farrar et al 2016). However, there are questions about the long-term success of IPM in relation to constant or increasing pesticide use.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These long-term impacts, termed “change in condition” in logic models (http://www.uwex.edu/ces/pdande/evaluation/evallogicmodel.html, accessed 9 September 2016) are due to many factors, including adoption of IPM. Some of the information in this article appears in a larger report, Adoption and Impacts of Integrated Pest Management in Agriculture in the Western United States (Farrar et al 2015), available at http://westernipm.org/index.cfm/about-the-center/publications/special-reports/adoption-and-impact-of-ipm-in-western-agriculture/, accessed 9 September 2016. We did not address economic risks in this analysis since these risks are continually being addressed by research and extension programs.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%