2002
DOI: 10.1186/1471-2474-3-10
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Adolescent standing postural response to backpack loads: a randomised controlled experimental study

Abstract: Background: Backpack loads produce changes in standing posture when compared with unloaded posture. Although 'poor' unloaded standing posture has been related to spinal pain, there is little evidence of whether, and how much, exposure to posterior load produces injurious effects on spinal tissue. The objective of this study was to describe the effect on adolescent sagittal plane standing posture of different loads and positions of a common design of school backpack. The underlying study aim was to test the app… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

6
109
1
17

Year Published

2006
2006
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
4

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 155 publications
(144 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
(37 reference statements)
6
109
1
17
Order By: Relevance
“…The other ways of carrying then usually lead to unilateral overload (14) and may result in the onset of back pain (6) . Evidence points out that positioning the school backpack at the waist level would be the most recommended position to prevent postural displacements (15) .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The other ways of carrying then usually lead to unilateral overload (14) and may result in the onset of back pain (6) . Evidence points out that positioning the school backpack at the waist level would be the most recommended position to prevent postural displacements (15) .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…19 With tissue tightness, body deformities and movement disorders among adults with CP, carrying a backpack at 10% BW may be too heavy. Findings from one of our pilot studies recommended a backpack carriage of 3 kg or less for adults with CP 26 ; another pilot study further limited the loading to 4 lb (~1.82kg) for participants with chronic LBP.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…13,16 Consequently, the trunk leaned forward so as to minimise the extension trunk moment during backpack carriage. 17,18 Grimmer et al 19 reported that this forward trunk lean was observed in case of backpack loading at 10% body weight (BW) or less. These findings helped to shape our understanding of the underlying mechanism and condition of backpack carriage in reducing back muscle activity.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This study was approved by the Ethics Committee of the University of Granada (Spain). 24 Underweight=Less than the 5th percentile; Healthy weight=5th percentile to less than the 85th percentile; Overweight=85th to less than the 95th percentile; Obese=Equal to or greater than the 95th percentile. Before calculating BMI, obtain accurate height and weight measurements.…”
Section: Figure 1 Subjects By Chronological Age Groupsmentioning
confidence: 99%