2020
DOI: 10.1016/j.jcbs.2019.12.006
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Adolescent correlates of the Generalized Pliance Questionnaire – Children

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
5
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
3
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…These findings align with previous research demonstrating that ACT is associated with reductions in adolescents' avoidance (Fang & Ding, 2020;Swain et al, 2015). In addition, our findings are consistent with research showing that generalized pliance is associated with psychological inflexibility in adolescence (i.e., we cohere with research suggesting that targeting psychological inflexibility may promote less problematic rulefollowing and vice versa; Salazar et al, 2018aSalazar et al, , 2018bStapleton & McHugh, 2020). Our high temporal density data also align with Salazar et al (2020) who reported AFQ-Y17 and GPQ-C ratings decreased for seven and four child participants respectively across 11/13 timepoints after an ACT intervention in their randomized multiple-baseline design across nine participants.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 92%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…These findings align with previous research demonstrating that ACT is associated with reductions in adolescents' avoidance (Fang & Ding, 2020;Swain et al, 2015). In addition, our findings are consistent with research showing that generalized pliance is associated with psychological inflexibility in adolescence (i.e., we cohere with research suggesting that targeting psychological inflexibility may promote less problematic rulefollowing and vice versa; Salazar et al, 2018aSalazar et al, , 2018bStapleton & McHugh, 2020). Our high temporal density data also align with Salazar et al (2020) who reported AFQ-Y17 and GPQ-C ratings decreased for seven and four child participants respectively across 11/13 timepoints after an ACT intervention in their randomized multiple-baseline design across nine participants.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 92%
“…The Generalized Pliance Questionnaire for Children (GPQ-C; Salazar et al, 2018a) assesses generalized pliance via eight items rated on a 5-point scale ranging from 1 (never true) to 5 (always true), with higher scores indicative of higher generalized pliance. Research has supported the factor structure, convergent validity, criterion validity, and reliability of the GPQ-C (Salazar et al, 2018a(Salazar et al, , 2018bStapleton & McHugh, 2020).…”
Section: Quantitative Self-report Measures Completed Pre-and Post-int...mentioning
confidence: 98%
“…Likewise, Salazar et al (2019) showed that the GPQ-C can discriminate between children with learning difficulties and control participants and that GPQ-C scores showed a strong correlation with the performance on the WCST. Lastly, Stapleton and McHugh (2020) have also found that scores on the GPQ-C correlated positively with measures of empathic concern and capacity for interpersonal pleasure.…”
mentioning
confidence: 82%
“…In terms of an RFT interpretation of PH messaging, consider the following example, whereby a PH message states that everyone needs to be at least one meter distance from others outside of their household, and at all times, to prevent the spread of COVID-19. According to an RFT interpretation, then this rule-based information (stimuli) are organized into a network of relational frames (Stapleton, 2020;Stapleton and McHugh, 2020), whereby word classes (e.g., COVID-19) are framed in coordination (i.e., identifying sameness) with an event class (i.e., the actual COVID-19 virus), and framed in distinction to others (i.e., the act of distancing from others). What is interesting about the RFT account, is that it has a framework for explaining how the function of "distance with others" (distinction relation with others) changes through ToF, in that "distance with others" was neutral, and now given the PH message rule, individuals may be fearful for catching or spreading the virus (if they are not distanced with others) through the consequences of what danger the virus will bring (e.g., death, further long term lock down, etc.…”
Section: A Contextual Extension To the Behavioral Analytical Perspective Of Biased Decisionsmentioning
confidence: 99%