2008
DOI: 10.1089/jmf.2007.567
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Additive Action of Royal Jelly and Honey AgainstStaphylococcus aureus

Abstract: Four varieties of honey and one variety of freshly reaped royal jelly (RJ) were used to evaluate their additive action against Staphylococcus aureus (ATCC 29523). In a first step honey and RJ were used separately to determine their minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) against the tested strain. In a second step, lower concentrations of honey than the MIC were added to lower concentrations of RJ than the MIC and then incorporated into media to determine the minimum additive inhibitory concentration. When test… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
29
2

Year Published

2011
2011
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 32 publications
(35 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
3
29
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Many antimicrobial peptides have been discovered in the composition of RJ including royalactin, apisimin, jeleines I, II, III, IV, 10-HDA, and apalbumin α (2). In vitro studies have demonstrated that royalactin that is obtained from RJ was effective against gram positive bacteria including MRSA and some gram negative bacteria (3,5,14).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Many antimicrobial peptides have been discovered in the composition of RJ including royalactin, apisimin, jeleines I, II, III, IV, 10-HDA, and apalbumin α (2). In vitro studies have demonstrated that royalactin that is obtained from RJ was effective against gram positive bacteria including MRSA and some gram negative bacteria (3,5,14).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For both types of honeys-Italian and Spanish Forest honeys, it was found to rapidly clear the infection in the wound, and promote and clean healthy granulation tissue. The antimicrobial activity of the combination of RJ and honey was studied [37,38], and the additive activity of RJ and honey against P. aeruginosa was found, as comparison with the experiments in this study, where the water soluble F-RJ (M) did not affect the Forest honey in term of statistically stronger antimicrobial activity. Al-Waili et al [39] also analysed the antimicrobial activity of the combination of ethanol extract of propolis and honey from Saudi Arabia, and found the synergism between the ethanol extract of Saudi propolis or Egyptian propolis with honey from Saudi Arabia in term of killing of MRSA, E. coli and C. albicans.…”
Section: The Growth Promoting Activity Of Tlt Cell Line By the Combinmentioning
confidence: 52%
“…3.34 CFU/mL >8 log CFU/mL >8 log CFU/mL 20% >8 log CFU/mL >8 log CFU/mL 30% 3.53 CFU/mL 1.39 CFU/mL 40% 0 0 RJ 10% 3.34 CFU/mL >8 log CFU/mL >8 log CFU/mL 20% 0 0 30% 0 0 RJ:RH (1:100) 10% 3.34 CFU/mL >8 log CFU/mL >8 log CFU/mL 20% 3.58 log CFU/mL 2.11 log CFU/mL 30% 0 0 40% 0 0 3.17 CFU/mL >7 log CFU/mL >7 log CFU/mL 20% >7 log CFU/mL >7 log CFU/mL 30% >7 log CFU/mL >7 log CFU/mL 3.17 CFU/mL >7 log CFU/mL >7 log CFU/mL 20% >7 log CFU/mL >7 log CFU/mL 30% >7 log CFU/mL >7 log CFU/mL 40% 0 3.47 log CFU/mL (v/v). When honey and RJ were used jointly, all honey varieties had a more than 50% decrease in MIC with 1% (v/v) RJ (Boukraa et al, 2008). In another study in Algeria, the MIC of RJ was 1.7% (vol /vol) against S. aureus and 2% against Escherichia coli (Boukraa et al, 2009).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 96%