2008
DOI: 10.3138/infor.46.1.51
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Adaptive Systems Thinking in Integrated Water Resources Management with Insights into Conflicts over Water Exports

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
22
0
3

Year Published

2008
2008
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
3
2
2
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 34 publications
(25 citation statements)
references
References 52 publications
0
22
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…In fact, the import of game theory goes well beyond these domains of applicability. As argued by Hipel and Fang (2005) and Hipel et al (2007Hipel et al ( , 2008aHipel et al ( , 2009a, many conflict problems are highly interconnected with other types of disputes. For instance, disagreements over how to combat global warming and climate change are intertwined with debates over how to handle decreasing supplies of fresh water, confront widespread water pollution, respond to increasingly extreme weather conditions, tackle the food crisis, attend to energy scarcity, reverse the growing gap between the rich and poor, turn around sagging industrial output in many regions, address exploding population growth, and enhance security.…”
Section: Game Theory In Perspectivementioning
confidence: 96%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In fact, the import of game theory goes well beyond these domains of applicability. As argued by Hipel and Fang (2005) and Hipel et al (2007Hipel et al ( , 2008aHipel et al ( , 2009a, many conflict problems are highly interconnected with other types of disputes. For instance, disagreements over how to combat global warming and climate change are intertwined with debates over how to handle decreasing supplies of fresh water, confront widespread water pollution, respond to increasingly extreme weather conditions, tackle the food crisis, attend to energy scarcity, reverse the growing gap between the rich and poor, turn around sagging industrial output in many regions, address exploding population growth, and enhance security.…”
Section: Game Theory In Perspectivementioning
confidence: 96%
“…Except for the Nash non-cooperative solution concept (Nash 1951), additional non-cooperative stability definitions have been applied to water resources games only by a limited number of people who use the Graph Model for Conflict Resolution (GMCR) (Kilgour et al 1987;Fang et al 1993) and its associated decision support system (Fang et al 2003a, b;Hipel et al 2007Hipel et al , 2008b in their strategic studies (Okada et al 1999;Hipel et al 2003;Noakes et al 2003;Li et al 2004;Gopalakrishnan et al 2005;Ma et al 2005;Vieira et al 2005;Madani and Hipel 2007;Nandalal and Hipel 2007;Elimam et al 2008;Getirana et al 2008;Hipel et al 2008a;Getirana and Malta 2010). Non-cooperative stability definitions can facilitate predicating the likely outcomes of the game and the expected behavior of the players who give priority to their own objectives, rather than the system objective (as considered by cooperative methods).…”
Section: Game Theory In Perspectivementioning
confidence: 98%
“…Rapid development of appropriate sanitation policy is therefore of particular concern for groundwater quality management in developing countries, but the success of this is predicated on 1) the establishment of baseline data (Back, Rivett, Hinz, Mackay, Wanangwa, Phiri, Songola, Thomas, Kumwenda, Nhlema, Miller and Kalin, 2018), and 2) development of a systems-thinking approach (e.g., Hipel, Obeidi, Fang and Kilgour, 2008) to holistic water resource management. Systemsthinking practices have emerged over decades of relatively intensive resource use, but emerging economies must transition from existing practices, where aquifers are managed as increasingly stressed common pool resources (Madani and Dinar, 2012), towards integrated systems management.…”
Section: Future Governancementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Rapid development of appropriate water, sanitation and hygiene (WASH) policy, and public education about that policy in the context of a common pool resource, is therefore of particular concern for groundwater quality management in developing countries; however, the successful development and implementation of such policy is predicated on 1) the establishment of baseline data (Back, et al, 2018), and 2) development of a complete understanding of the physical, climatic, sociopolitical, economic and cultural factors that frame and underpin the value of the groundwater system (e.g., Barnaby, 2009, Fowler, et al, 2003, Gill, et al, 2017, Jennaway, 2008). Only with this knowledge in hand can sustainable development of the groundwater system proceed effectively under an essentially systems-thinking approach (e.g., Hipel, Obeidi, Fang and Kilgour, 2008) to holistic water resource management.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…해외 에서는 거버넌스 차원에서 지역간 물이전과 용도별 물배 분 방안을 제시한 연구가 많았는데, 특히 국제적 물분쟁 해결을 위한 체제구축에 대한 연구가 활발하다 (Correia and Silva, 1999;Candela et al, 2008;Hearns, 2010;Lugo, 2010;Blatter and Ingram, 2011). 한편 다기준의사결정에 의한 해법은 대안들을 평가해 최선안을 추천하는 것으로 다양한 기준에 의한 개인별 판단을 종합할 수 있는 장점이 있어 해외에서는 물분쟁 조정 등에 직접 활용한 사례 (Hipel et al, 2008;Bashar et al, 2012;Ke et al, 2012)가 있으나, 국내에서는 용수배분 (Lee and Shim, 2002;Yi et al, 2004)이나 유역관리 (Chung, 2007) (Park et al, 2009;Tan et al, 2012;Ratner et al, 2013). 한편개별 물분쟁 사례의 갈등구조를 파악하고 해결방안을 심층적으로 분석한최근의연구로서Bae and Lim(2010)은네트워크거버 넌스 (Lee, 2002;Agranoff and McGuire, 2001;Sorensen and Torfing, 2005;Provan and Kenis, 2008) Fig.…”
unclassified