2015
DOI: 10.1016/j.eswa.2015.04.046
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Adaptive sliding-mode type-2 neuro-fuzzy control of an induction motor

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
54
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 69 publications
(54 citation statements)
references
References 30 publications
0
54
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The weight of rice on the conveyor belt varies each time; thus, the weight of rice cannot be determined by fixing the advancing distance. When the difference between the entered value in the fuzzy controller and the practical weight is positive, the stepper motor operates one step pitch in one operation cycle and realizes the integral control of motor rpm by continuously monitoring the weighting signals [12][13][14][15][16][17][18] .The motor stops running when the difference between the entered value and the practical weight is zero.…”
Section: Fig 4 Control System Flowchartmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The weight of rice on the conveyor belt varies each time; thus, the weight of rice cannot be determined by fixing the advancing distance. When the difference between the entered value in the fuzzy controller and the practical weight is positive, the stepper motor operates one step pitch in one operation cycle and realizes the integral control of motor rpm by continuously monitoring the weighting signals [12][13][14][15][16][17][18] .The motor stops running when the difference between the entered value and the practical weight is zero.…”
Section: Fig 4 Control System Flowchartmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Due to this obtain improved performance the Induction motor [5].The simplicity SVM algorithm without flux controller and current transformations developed using direct flux vector control method [6]. The high power rating Induction motor drive ripple in torque is reduced using SVPWM method and also comparison of ripple conventional two level inverter with five level inverter [7].The induction motor performance is improved with type-2 neuro fuzzy sliding mode compare with Neuro fuzzy type-1 when control parameter changes [8].The clustering and gradient algorithm are used to developed the novel neuro fuzzy type-2 system [9]. Pulse width modulation with hybrid space to obtain three phase duty ratio is difficult at higher switching levels frequencies and require sector identification .Implementation of NFC is independent of switching frequency and duty ratio with rotation angle ,change of rotation of angle at higher switching level frequency [10].To reduce torque ripple with performance of induction motor type-2 fuzzy logic speed & current controller placed instead of convention PI speed & current controller .The induction drive implement at no load & step change in load and THD values are compared [11].Direct torque control of Induction motor drive with SVPWM method is used to reduced ripples in torque ,voltage and current [12].Type-2 FNN is compared with type-1 fuzzy systems [13].The comparison of performance between proportional integral (PIDTC) with F2DTC [14].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Studies in recent years, in order to improve the performance of the induction motor drive systems, used artificial intelligence‐based methods such as artificial neural network (ANN), fuzzy logic, adaptive neuro‐fuzzy inference system (ANFIS), and genetic algorithm, expert system …”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…7,8 Studies in recent years, in order to improve the performance of the induction motor drive systems, used artificial intelligence-based methods such as artificial neural network (ANN), fuzzy logic, adaptive neuro-fuzzy inference system (ANFIS), and genetic algorithm, expert system. [9][10][11][12][13] The ANN has been successfully used for the control of dynamic system and identification. It is easy to design nonlinear controllers with the ability ANN modeling of nonlinear dynamical systems.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%