2012
DOI: 10.1007/s11277-012-0695-2
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Adaptive Priority Sliding Admission Control and Scheduling Scheme for DCF and EDCA WLANs

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…After the IEEE 802.11e amendment [24] established the foundations for traffic prioritization, many investigations focused on queuing management as a means to enhance QoS [38,53,43,10]. With the improvements in radio resource utilization provided by the IEEE 802.11n amendment [25], researchers focused on channel optimization and fairness (e.g., modifying or predicting the Aggregated MAC Service Data Unit (A-MSDU) behavior) [50,35,5,39,54].…”
Section: Sdn Management and Ieee 80211 Qos Deliverymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…After the IEEE 802.11e amendment [24] established the foundations for traffic prioritization, many investigations focused on queuing management as a means to enhance QoS [38,53,43,10]. With the improvements in radio resource utilization provided by the IEEE 802.11n amendment [25], researchers focused on channel optimization and fairness (e.g., modifying or predicting the Aggregated MAC Service Data Unit (A-MSDU) behavior) [50,35,5,39,54].…”
Section: Sdn Management and Ieee 80211 Qos Deliverymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Table 1 presents an overview of the related work in IEEE 802.11 networks, summarizing how each approach targets network management, QoS support, the RA method, and the tools used for experimentation. After the IEEE 802.11e amendment [23] established the foundations for traffic prioritization, many investigations focused on queuing management as a means to enhance QoS [24][25][26][27]. Most work concentrated on scheduling schemes incorporating the length of the traffic queues, the time to serve a packet, or the time waiting on the scheduler.…”
Section: Resource Allocation and Qos Supportmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, EDCA mechanism is unsatisfactory for supporting real-time applications with rough QoS requirements, especially in heavily loaded networks, where collision possibility is high. Recently, a number of efforts have been presented to discuss the deficiency of supporting QoS in EDCA mode such as [7,8,9].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%