2015
DOI: 10.1109/tpel.2014.2323895
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Adaptive Peak-Inductor-Current-Controlled PFM Boost Converter With a Near-Threshold Startup Voltage and High Efficiency

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
15
0
1

Year Published

2017
2017
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 50 publications
(18 citation statements)
references
References 32 publications
0
15
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Fig. 10(b) shows the circuit of high voltage selector, which is modified from the circuit in [25]. Rather than traditional gate terminals, the source terminals are used as the inputs in the comparing stage.…”
Section: A Small-signal Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Fig. 10(b) shows the circuit of high voltage selector, which is modified from the circuit in [25]. Rather than traditional gate terminals, the source terminals are used as the inputs in the comparing stage.…”
Section: A Small-signal Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The frequency of the adaptive on‐time boost converter is not constant, so their switching loss is high and the efficiency is low. Therefore, the efficiency of the proposed boost converter is lower than the efficiencies of the boost converter in other studies, but it is still higher than the efficiencies of the boost converter in . When the load current is changed from 5 to 300 mA and from 300 to 5 mA, the measured transient response time is about 2 and 3 μs, respectively, which are the faster than the other works.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 67%
“…Therefore, the efficiency of the proposed boost converter is lower than the efficiencies of the boost converter in other studies, 9,20 but it is still higher than the efficiencies of the boost converter in. 8,16 When the load current is changed from 5 to 300 mA and from 300 to 5 mA, the measured transient response time is about 2 and 3 μs, respectively, which are the faster than the other works. Thus, the proposed boost converter provides fast-transient response and high efficiency.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 79%
“…In the range of the light load (less than 100 mA), the maximum power efficiency improvements occurring at a load current of 20 mA are 16.3% and 5.0% compared to the conventional full-swing and low-swing buck converters, respectively. Table I summarizes the measured performances and design specifications of the proposed, conventional low-swing [4], variable frequency control [5], pulse-frequency-control (PFM) [6,8], adaptive gate swing control [13], charge-recycling [15,16] and switched capacitor hybrid [18] DC-DC converters. Compared to conventional works, the proposed buck converter has a wide range of output voltage from 1.2 V to 2.3 V and can be used in applications requiring various output voltages.…”
Section: Gatementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Various design techniques have been reported for reducing the switching loss. Pulse frequency modulation (PFM) [5][6][7][8], pulse skip mode [9] and burst-mode scheme [10] are several representative frequency control techniques. However, they have poor output regulation and experience the electromagnetic interference (EMI) noise problem.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%