2016
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijleo.2015.12.122
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Adaptive chaos parallel clonal selection algorithm for objective optimization in WTA application

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
11
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 33 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
0
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Due to the complexity of the real combat situation, the model's efficiency would increase, once the issue is simplified and a more accurate answer is achieved. Consequently, in comparison with other assignment model 15,17,19 , a linear assignment model is being presented based on a simplification of the issue. Even if there is a big number of targets and sites, it only takes about 3 s to solve the model by obtaining the information from the experts before the combat with the information from the sensors.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Due to the complexity of the real combat situation, the model's efficiency would increase, once the issue is simplified and a more accurate answer is achieved. Consequently, in comparison with other assignment model 15,17,19 , a linear assignment model is being presented based on a simplification of the issue. Even if there is a big number of targets and sites, it only takes about 3 s to solve the model by obtaining the information from the experts before the combat with the information from the sensors.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…the target-site assignment. and the relevant methods solving them, numerous studies have been done [13][14][15][16][17][18] . Ahner & Parson 19 have submitted a model for WTA, by using dynamic programming and stochastic process approach.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Lee et al [6] 2002 IS + ACO Static single objective Lee et al [7] 2002 GA Static single objective Lee et al [8] 2003 GA + ACO Static single objective Galati and Simaan [5] 2007 Tabu Dynamic single objective Lee [9] 2010 VLSN Static single objective Xin et al [10] 2010 VP + tabu Dynamic single objective Li and Dong [11] 2010 DPSO + SA Dynamic single objective Chen et al [12] 2010 SA Static single objective Xin et al [13] 2011 Rule-based heuristic Dynamic multiobjective Fei et al [14] 2012 Auction algorithm Static single objective Bogdanowicz et al [15] 2013 GA Static single objective Liu et al [16] 2013 MOPSO Static multiobjective Zhang et al [17] 2014 MOEA/D Static multiobjective Ahner and Parson [18] 2015 Dynamic programming Dynamic multiobjective Li et al [19] 2015 NSGA-II, MOEA/D Static multiobjective Dirik et al [20] 2015 MILP Dynamic multiobjective Hongtao and Fengju [21] 2016 CSA Static single objective Li et al [22] 2016 MDE Dynamic multiobjective Li et al [23] 2017 MPACO Static multiobjective 2 International Journal of Aerospace Engineering population members and also allow the NSGA-III to perform well on MOP with differently scaled objective values. This is an advantage of the NSGA-III and another reason why we choose the NSGA-III algorithm to solve the SMWTA problem.…”
Section: Researchersmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…According to the model of asset-based MOSWTA problem, the individual of this problem has many constraints. Liang and Kang [23] designed a decimal encoding which can handle the constraints of this problem effectively. The illustration of this encoding is as follows.…”
Section: The Individual Encoding and Constraint Handlingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Xue et al [22] showed an improved discrete differential evolution (DE) algorithm for a cooperative jamming WTA problem. Hongtao and Fengju [23] proposed a new clonal selection algorithm for WTA problem. Chen et al [24] used memetic algorithms for DWTA.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%