2022
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijintrel.2022.04.010
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Adaptation of Intercultural Sensitivity Scale for Turkish medical students

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…It is not uncommon for scale dimensions to change in cross-cultural validation ( 64 , 65 ). The new dimension that emerged was reflected in the initial MPQ design ( 34 , 50 ) but suggests that the Chinese view flexibility differently.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is not uncommon for scale dimensions to change in cross-cultural validation ( 64 , 65 ). The new dimension that emerged was reflected in the initial MPQ design ( 34 , 50 ) but suggests that the Chinese view flexibility differently.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…An EFA was conducted in order to test the factor structure of the ELES. In cross-cultural studies, researchers may use both EFA and CFA (e.g., Bahar-Özvarıs ¸et al, 2022;Ma et al, 2022;Ulas ¸-Kılıç, 2021). Researchers typically employ EFA before CFA to determine whether a scale's factor structure may raise questions about its validity or generalizability if the original factor structure cannot be confirmed (Van Prooijen & Van Der Kloot, 2001).…”
Section: Exploratory Factor Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%