2019 IEEE Winter Conference on Applications of Computer Vision (WACV) 2019
DOI: 10.1109/wacv.2019.00156
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Action-Agnostic Human Pose Forecasting

Abstract: Predicting and forecasting human dynamics is a very interesting but challenging task with several prospective applications in robotics, health-care, etc. Recently, several methods have been developed for human pose forecasting; however, they often introduce a number of limitations in their settings. For instance, previous work either focused only on short-term or long-term predictions, while sacrificing one or the other. Furthermore, they included the activity labels as part of the training process, and requir… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
69
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 115 publications
(69 citation statements)
references
References 43 publications
(165 reference statements)
0
69
0
Order By: Relevance
“…5. As in [17], [52], the dataset is split into 1258 samples for training and 1068 for testing. Following [17], we input the initial velocity and predict the next 16 frames of poses.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…5. As in [17], [52], the dataset is split into 1258 samples for training and 1068 for testing. Following [17], we input the initial velocity and predict the next 16 frames of poses.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Holden et al [2], [37] learned latent feature representations by operating 3D joint positions, which benefits multiple application fields like motion generation, recovery, and comparison. While training on 3D position suffers from skeleton constraints such as bone stretching, in [17] and [21], they modeled joint angles and tested on both angle and position spaces of their generations for a more comprehensive evaluation under different parameterizations. Following their work, for Human3.6M [38] and CMU MoCap datasets [39] we train on joint angles as they are invariant of bone length constraints and thus stabilizing the model fitting.…”
Section: Parameterizationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations