2020
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-030-58545-7_20
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

DLow: Diversifying Latent Flows for Diverse Human Motion Prediction

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
198
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 169 publications
(213 citation statements)
references
References 45 publications
1
198
0
Order By: Relevance
“…These include feed-forward networks [10,41], convolutional autoencoders [24,17], recurrent neural networks [42,15,16,25], often with adversarial components [17,33], or reinforcement learning [67]. Other approaches include probabilistic models, such as conditional restricted Boltzmann machines [61,60], variational autoencoders [2,3,69,73], and normalizing flows [20]. In general, research in this area assumes that body poses observed in the past are complete-with no missing joints.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These include feed-forward networks [10,41], convolutional autoencoders [24,17], recurrent neural networks [42,15,16,25], often with adversarial components [17,33], or reinforcement learning [67]. Other approaches include probabilistic models, such as conditional restricted Boltzmann machines [61,60], variational autoencoders [2,3,69,73], and normalizing flows [20]. In general, research in this area assumes that body poses observed in the past are complete-with no missing joints.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We measure the diversity of random markers samples from our WholeGrasp-VAE. We follow [58] to employ the Average L2 Pairwise Distance (APD) to evaluate the diversity within random samples, which is given by AP D =…”
Section: Stochastic Whole-body Grasp Pose Synthesismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For deterministic models, we measures the marker prediction accuracy by computing the Average L2 Distance Error (ADE) between the predicted markers and ground truth. For our generative model, we follow [58] to measure the sample accuracy by computing the minimal error between the ground truth and 10 random samples. (2) Motion smoothness.…”
Section: Stochastic Motion Infillingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Model ADE (m) ↓ FDE (m) ↓ LDS-AF [35] 1.66 3.58 DLow-AF [56] 1.78 3.77 Trajectron++ [46] 1.51 -AgentFormer [57] 1.45…”
Section: B5 Improving Rule-based Plannermentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Prediction performance is compared to reported results for recent state-of-the art models AgentFormer [57], Trajec-tron++ [46], DLow-AF [56], and LDS-AF [35]. Results are shown in Tab.…”
Section: C11 Baseline Comparisonmentioning
confidence: 99%