2021
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijggc.2021.103313
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Acoustic and optical determination of bubble size distributions – Quantification of seabed gas emissions

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
13
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 28 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 42 publications
0
13
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Chronological metadata series were used to analyze the magnitude modulation along time and thus provide a relative estimation of the flares flow rate changes. For weaker and intermittent or impulsive energy events, once visually recognized, the relative segments were analyzed using a shorttime Fourier transform and a threshold algorithm was implemented following Peregrine, 1994 andLi et al, 2021 in order to identify and count bubbles events, obtaining a bubble size distribution for each deployment. The power spectrum analysis, performed on the acoustic records, revealed that the areas surrounding the observatory deployment sites radiated significant acoustic energy at a wide frequency band, apart from the ones of the typical ambient noise, as depicted by Figure 3, where PSD representative of the entire month of June is shown.…”
Section: Spectral Data Extrapolationmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Chronological metadata series were used to analyze the magnitude modulation along time and thus provide a relative estimation of the flares flow rate changes. For weaker and intermittent or impulsive energy events, once visually recognized, the relative segments were analyzed using a shorttime Fourier transform and a threshold algorithm was implemented following Peregrine, 1994 andLi et al, 2021 in order to identify and count bubbles events, obtaining a bubble size distribution for each deployment. The power spectrum analysis, performed on the acoustic records, revealed that the areas surrounding the observatory deployment sites radiated significant acoustic energy at a wide frequency band, apart from the ones of the typical ambient noise, as depicted by Figure 3, where PSD representative of the entire month of June is shown.…”
Section: Spectral Data Extrapolationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A time-frequency approach to discriminate between bubble sound emission and noise can be implemented. We took into account what was already proposed and successfully used by Li et al (2021) and implemented a single bubble identification method based upon bubble characteristics recognition, that includes pulsation time interval, frequency bandwidth and energy strength. As the signature of a bubble is a transient event with an exponentially decaying coda, each discrete time series of the acquired acoustic record was firstly divided into 75% overlapping segments, where the length of each one was chosen in order to approximately match the average duration of the bubble signature and simultaneously guarantee a suitable frequency resolution.…”
Section: Acoustical Bubble Identification and Thresholding Algorithmmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Passive acoustic sensors, or hydrophones, can be used to detect the presence of bubbles based on their acoustic emissions [18]. Several studies demonstrate the capability to quantify bubble seepage using passive acoustic sensors [38,39], although further studies are encouraged to investigate the accuracy of these estimates. The detection range depends on the background noise level, leak rate, and sensitivity of the sensor.…”
Section: Acoustic Sensorsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Rodrigues and Rubio [9] classified them into intrusive and nonintrusive methods. The intrusive methods include electroresistivity [43][44][45][46], ultrasound reflection [47][48][49][50][51], and optical techniques [52][53][54][55][56][57][58], which inevitably cause instrumented interference on bubble samples. In comparison to those approaches, the imaging technique as a nonintrusive method has been primarily adopted for both academic and industry bubble size measurement due to lower cost and ease of operation [5,9,15,16,28,30,59].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%